Answer:
<em>Economic growth refers to a steady increase in the production of goods and services in an economic system.</em><em> </em><em><u>True</u></em>
Answer:
c. No; the facts of this situation do not provide reasonable grounds for a stop and search. Any attempt to do so by store security could result in a claim of false imprisonment.
Explanation:
According to the situation described in the question above, store security has no right to stop and search for Jeff. Therefore, the letter c is the most correct answer to this question.
Jeff's actions in the store do not provide sufficient reasons for there to be any kind of stop and research, as the facts in the situation do not provide enough information about an illegal act, so if store security forces a situation there could be legal damage to the store .
Therefore, it is essential that stores adopt a theft prevention strategy, with an effective security system and a team prepared to carry out correct approaches.
When a healthcare organization allows an unsafe condition to exist on its property and does nothing to address it and a visitor gets injured, the organization will be held liable because the injury was foreseeable and the organization had a duty to care. <span>The organization has to take reasonable steps to ensure the health, safety and welfare of their employees and visitors. </span>
<span>Fair value is defined as, a rational and unbiased estimate of the potential market price of a good, service, or asset. It takes into account such objective factors as: acquisition/production/distribution costs, replacement costs, or costs of close substitutes.
Since this is an opinion question, either answering yes or no is correct, but you have to say why.
If I understand the question correctly, and the question isn't missing any parts, I would assume it's asking if you should put value on contracts as a document and other financial instruments.
I was going to say no, but because contracts can be transferred or used as currency, I would say yes.
If you say yes I would argue that giving a fair value of the contracts would make them more legal and have more bearing in a place of business. That it would prevent the fluctuation of value on that contract based on other factors like profit/loss and whether or not you transferred, changed, etc. the contract. I would argue that to protect that contract and other financial instruments, and the holders stake in it, you should create a fair value for it.
If you say no, I would argue that the contract can already be treated as a form of currency, and because of that it should not have a fair value placed on it. I would also argue that because contracts often times state the value of that contract within itself, that it should not have a fair value. And finally, I would argue that because with time, the value of items change, you should not place a fair value on a document that can be changed and can lose or gain value with time based on the purposed information in the contract.
</span>
<span>0.75
The midpoint method is to calculate the percentage as the change in value divided by the average (or midpoint) of the new and old values. So the price of the sandwich changed from $5 to $7. Using the midpoint formula, you get
(7-5)/((7+5)/2) = 2/(12/2) = 2/6 = 0.3333 = +33.3%
The change in sandwiches due to the change in price is
(90-70)/((90+70)/2) = 20/(160/2) = 20/80 = 0.25 = +25%
The elasticity of supply will be the percentage change in demand divided by the percentage change in price. So
25/33.3 = 0.75
So the coefficient of elasticity is 0.75</span>
