The way to achieve this impartiality – to free judges to decide cases based on what the law actually requires, and on nothing else – is to ensure that the judiciary is independent, or, put differently, not subject to reprisals for decisions on the bench.
But judicial independence is not an absolute or singular value defining our courts. The principle of judicial restraint is equally important – and it is inextricably linked to judicial independence. At one level, the tension between the two seems inescapable. But there is an important sense in which an independent judiciary and judicial restraint are flip sides of the same coin. Both aim to minimize the influence of extraneous factors on judicial decision-making. A judge must not decide a case with an eye toward public approbation, because whether a particular result is popular is irrelevant to whether it is legally sound. In the same way, a judge must not consult
Answer:
About 585 slaves aboard each ship.
Explanation:
<u>If you divide the amount of voyages (20,528) by the number of slaves (12,000,000) you will get a decimal that rounds up to 585.</u>
Step one) Divide the number of slaves by the number of voyages
<h3>12,000,000 ÷ 20,528 = 584.5</h3>
Step two) Round your answer to the nearest whole number
<h3>584.5 ≈ 585</h3>
Hope this helps!
Answer:
America has more opportunities.
Explanation:
America has a larger and wealthier economy,causing people to immigrate there for a higher chance of getting a good pay.
I’m pretty sure it’s B. An international trade orginaization
Answer:
Answer is B
Explanation:
got it right on the test
please mark me brainliest
