Answer:
<h3>The comparison and contrast of Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification with Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification lies on the concept of social position and power.</h3>
Explanation:
Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective of social stratification and Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification all emphasize on the presence of a power structure in a society which directly corresponds to the position of an individual. They all believed that society operates according to the social needs and that every individual performs their tasks accordingly.
The line of distinction between Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective and Mosca’s conflict perspective lies in the nature of men. Mosca believes that man is evil and dominating by nature and that compels him/her to misuse his position. He brings out the authority and power of the ruling class as an example to this argument. He argues that people in good position will eventually become more powerful as men are ambitious and selfish. They will gradually exploit people from lower position and use their power for their own personal gains.
While on the other hand, Davis and Moore argue that the greater the role of an individual is, the greater should be the reward. They illustrate the idea that people with bigger and greater roles should be given more importance because of their greater contributions to the society. Their perspective of social stratification emphasize that not everyone can perform the exclusive task of the doctors, therefore those who could perform such complicated tasks should be paid and rewarded more. Davis and Moore do not consider misuse of position and power by people of great influence.
In my opinion, Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification is more applicable and realistic. The fact that those who worked hard deserves a reward is a universal doctrine. These people spent a lot of effort and time before acquiring the position they are in today. Their effort and hard work should be rewarded greatly as they will contribute significantly to the society. Though, this perspective does not bring into account the chances of misuse of power and position, such elements can be controlled through efficient law and state control.
<span>Falling prices for crops and livestock, large debts, decrease in need of food. </span>
An alliance is an agreement by two or more parties to work together towards a common goal. For example, the United States formed an alliance with Great Britain and France during World War I.
The Iroquois Confederacy consist of 5 different Native American tribes from New York. These tribes include the Onondaga, Seneca, Cayuga, Oneida, and Mohawk. This confederacy had a well organized political structure and formed an alliance with each other as a means of protection against other tribes/countries.
Answer: <em>Nativist </em>
Explanation:
In discipline such as psychology, nativism tends to refer to the view or notion that certain or particular abilities or skills are hard-wired or native into brain at birth. This is further in contrast to the view of empiricism also known as the tabula rasa perspective, which refers to states that brain tends to have endowed with inborn skills for learning from its surroundings or environment .
When the law treats a business such as a corporation or a company like a person, it is a legal entity. A legal entity is a certificste that a business has a legal process of gaining their certificates in order to run their business in a proper and credible way.
