Answer:
1.The Boston Tea Party was a political protest that occurred on December 16, 1773, at Griffin's Wharf in Boston, Massachusetts.
2. The cause of the Boston Tea party is because of all of the new taxes made the American Colonists angry
3.As a result of the Boston Tea Party, the British shut down Boston Harbor until all of the 340 chests of British East India Company tea were paid for. This was implemented under the 1774 Intolerable Acts and known as the Boston Port Act.
4.This act, which came to be known as the Boston Tea Party, was important because it fueled the tension between Britain and America that ultimately led to the Revolutionary War, which started in 1775 and led to America winning its independence from Britain.
5.The Intolerable Acts were punitive laws passed by the British Parliament in 1774 after the Boston Tea Party. The laws were meant to punish the Massachusetts colonists for their defiance in the Tea Party protest in reaction to changes in taxation by the British Government.
Do the conclusion urself.
Explanation:
Hope this helps
No The right to trial by jury in the United States Constitution belongs only to adults.
Answer:
Zone of developmental readiness
Explanation:
The zone of proximal development concept was introduced by Vygotsky. It is called a zone of nearness or closet. He further develops the cognitive theory of Jean Piaget. Vygotsky observes fo a long time children notice that how the school instructions impact children.
He even observed how easily they grasp the language except for math and science. The language comes naturally. Math and science are the subjects that Vygotsky think that use zone proximal development that help children in improving to achieve their goal.
The distance or space between with the help and without help learning is called the zone of proximal readiness.
I agree. No acts of kindness go not noticed.
Answer:
Two advantages of limiting terms of government offices are to curb corruption and increase public accountability.
Explanation:
Limiting the term that public officials can serve in government positions can make the administration of public offices more transparent because it discourages corruption as no official is seated for very long in any one public office. The rules and regulations are kept transparent and no one can change the terms of administration to favor themselves for longer terms in office. One of the disadvantages is that long term policy decisions are less likely to be implemented and public officials build less expertise in state administration. There can also be talented administrators who have to leave their positions because of the term limits and this is a loss of talent for the state.
