Answer:
Clarity
Explanation:
Employment-at-will is the situation whereby an organization enters into a contractual relationship with an employee stating that they can be dismissed by the organization for any reason even without warning on the condition that the dismissal is not Illegal. Thus, to prove a wrongful dismissal based on public tort exception to employment at will is clarity.
Answer:
The answer is: Canadian workers will still have a higher productivity, it will be $0.40 per hour higher.
Explanation:
We can elaborate the following productivity table:
Year Canadian productivity British productivity
0 $33 per hour $29 per hour
1 $33.33 per hour $29.87 per hour
2 $33.66 per hour $30.77 per hour
3 $34 per hour $31.69 per hour
4 $34.34 per hour $32.64 per hour
5 $34.68 per hour $33.62 per hour
6 $35.03 per hour $34.63 per hour
At the end of year 6, Canadian workers' productivity will be $35.03 and British workers' productivity will be $34.63 per hour (Canadian workers will be $0.40 more productive).
Answer:
The amount of total interest over the entire mortgage period could she save by financing her home with the 15-year mortgage is $138,612
Explanation:
First find the total interest on the 30-year mortgage:
PV = 195,000
N = 360
FV = 0
I = 6.1/12 = 0.5083
195,000 = PMT × PVIFA (0.061/12, 360 months); (in excel)
PMT of 1,181.69 × 360 = 230,408;
Next find the total interest on the 15-year mortgage:
PV = 195,000
N = 180
FV = 0
I = 5.5/12 = 0.4583
195,000 = PMT × PVIFA (0.055/12, 180 months); (in excel)
PMT of 1,593.31 × 180 = 91,796;
The amount of interest saved is: $230,408.34 − $91,796.29 = $138,612.05
Answer:
The correct answer is False.
Explanation:
The concept of active audience appears around 1970 criticizing among others the hypodermic theory (the issuer of the information has an effect on the recipient, without it noticing).
Therefore, it involves changes in the receiving entity of the communicative activity. It provides a new paradigm that questions that of the linear-causal paradigm of communication: source-emitter-stimulus-receiver-effect towards a more complete explanation in which communication is analyzed and reinterpreted subjectively by the recipient of the message. The subject selects with pleasure the interpretation that best suits him and does not respond to the media with the simple 'stimulus-response' model but rather deconstructs the information he receives from the sender. It is important to note that decoding (and reconstruction) is based on a symbolic interpretation, consistent with your personal identity and subjectivities (age, race, sex, social class, ego, past experience), and according to identity collective and the social context where it is located. That is why we can remember the scholastic axiom of Saint Thomas Aquinas, based on Aristotle Quidquid recipitur ad modum recipientis recipitur (what is received, is received according to the mode of the one who receives it).
Answer:
1. $200
2. $255
3. $455
Explanation:
Producer surplus is the difference between the least price a producer is willing to sell his product and the price of the good.
Producer surplus = price - least price of the product
$400 - $350 = $50
$50 × 4 = $200
Consumer surplus is the difference between the willingness to pay of a consumer and the price of the good.
Consumer surplus = highest amount a consumer would be willing to pay - price
Consumer surplus for me = $435 - $400 = $35
Consumer surplus for the first friend = $400 - $400 = 0
Consumer surplus for the second friend = $560 - $400 = $160
Consumer surplus for the third friend = $460 - $400 = $60
Total surplus = consumer surplus + producer surplus
Total consumer surplus = $60 + $160 + 0 + $35 = $255
Total surplus = $255 + $200 = $455
I hope my answer helps you
