English because he was the King of England and born in England
Answer:
I think they should place more effort.
Explanation:
They should spread more food around the the nation. Use the taxes to help the community! Once the government takes care of what it has now, then they can try to expand the town or country. The government shouldn't try to expand the country, If they can't care for it.
Health (related to on Honduras)
If people can't afford to live in the city, then they have to live in the country. But that doesn't mean they shouldn't be uncared for. They should have at least 3 locations of near by health centers. Many work in the farmlands so there might be a bunch of issues like snakes, or accidents with the tool.
And since there in the country what are there suppose to do?
COUNTRY SIDES SHOULD HAVE CLOSE HEALTHCENTERS!!
(We met a women who had a ear infection and went to see the doctor, took her 3 hours walking.) (They are use to walking long distance but the thing was that there is no service) and she went there and the health center was CLOSED
(I personally have been to Honduras and I truly see the property , So I will answer with most honesty)
Answer:
he has less votes from representatives then popular votes
Answer:
D. an external locus of control
Explanation:
In psychology, there are two distinct types of locus of control including the internal and the external locus of control.
External locus of control is described as a process through which an individual feels that his or her failures or successes occur as a consequence of some external factors or reasons which is beyond his or her control, for example, unfair teachers, circumstance, prejudiced, luck, injustice, bias, fate, etc.
An individual who is experiencing an external locus of control generally feels anxious as he or she believe of not having any control over his or her life.
In the question above, Helene's lack of perceptiveness best illustrates the dangers of an external locus of control.
Answer:
He belief that political authority should rest with the people themselves is called: popular sovereignty
.
Explanation:
Popular sovereignty, also termed settler sovereignty, in U.S. archives, a provocative political theory according to which the personalities of federal provinces should choose for themselves whether their provinces would enroll the Union as vacant or slave states.
Popular sovereignty is the system that the government of a state and its administration are formed and maintained by the permission of its people, through their elected representatives.
