Answer:
Explanation:maiajasiI’a
And when we do it I think I will get it to the Jail is the only one thing that
Answer:
Israel was in chaos due to war with Chinese and Indians.
Explanation:
The Israel government attempted to stop the Chinese government from profiting from selling cooked cat and dog. In Word War III the Asians formed a group with the Indians to go hunting in the Israel for pets. They rode through the streets in wooden wagons with spears and metal chopsticks. Every once in a while they'd spot civilians walking with their pets. The group of hungry aliens would crouch upon the victim and bang them in the head with cinder blocks and bricks. Once dead they take the pet, they would place them in cages for transport to the cook site. The government couldn't tolerate this foul behavior so they planned all out raids on these gourmet terrorist. Over time our Israel government has put a stop to these actions all over Israel. So the Chinese became angry and created coronavirus.
Answer:
Human trafficking involves the use of force, fraud, or coercion to obtain some type of labor or commercial sex act. Every year, millions of men, women, and children are trafficked worldwide – including right here in the United States.
Explanation:
HOPE THAT THIS IS HELPFUL.
HAVE AN AWESOME DAY.
Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss aversion will provide additional motivation
.
Options:
A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss
aversion will provide additional motivation
B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss
C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity
D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity
Explanation:
The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.
This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.
