Answer:
<u>Step 1: Determine which options are correct
</u>
<em>Which scenarios are considered ethically acceptable for journalists? Select three options/
</em>
- Option A: paying money to attend a conference about climate change in order to do research for an article
- Option C: ending an investigation because it may lead to violence and disunity in a local community
- Option D: interviewing the CEOs of two insurance companies that are competing against each other
Option B doesn't make sense because if you are getting paid by a politician, that can further produce bias which can then lead to false things being spoke/written. Option E doesn't make sense because if you use information from a wiki page, that source is not verified which means that the source is unreliable. Therefore, the correct options are A, C, and D.
<u>Look at attachment</u>
What? Never watched it look it up? Sorry it isn’t much help
Yes although it wasn’t from appearance they laugh in the same, loud way, and sometimes they have the same ideas.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Because the entire article speaks about the evolution of drinking utensils.
I hope this help!!
Hi!
What is the paragraph.
A) would be like rich chocolate, as overwhelming
B) im not sure
c) its like mud
d) lots of money