Answer:
A. Pangeans are historically untrustworthy.
Explanation:
The speaker's point of view is most likely that Pangeans are historically untrustworthy. At the beginning of the passage, he states that Pangea has long yearned to possess their resources. That's why he thinks they're likely to attack. Based on the following statements, we can conclude that Pangeans already tried defeating them. He doesn't explicitly state that it was them who attacked (<em>We have never been defeated before </em>- he doesn't say by whom), but based on the context, we can make this conclusion.
The speaker says that his people will defend what is theirs, which means that they will respond to violence by violence. To him, war isn't the last resort for resolving conflict.
Democratic principles are something he obviously treasures (<em>what makes us fair-minded and democratic is our strong national character</em>), and he never says anything about suspending them during wartime.
This is why option A is the correct one.
False. I think it would be biased about the group.
Im 99% sure that it is metaphor
The quote in the question above is the BASIC PLOT of "I'm Nobody! Who are you<span>?", a short lyric poem by Emily Dickinson.
</span>Further analyzing the poem, we can observe that the narrator's POV is first person, and the message that the poem passes across is that being a nobody isn't as bad as people think it is. Also, the poem seeks to establish that public people lose privacy so being public may not be as great as people think it is. Overall, the <span>style used is iambic tetrameter and trimeter.</span>