Answer:
She used inductive reasoning. (False)
She used the law of detachment. (True)
Her conclusion is valid. (True)
The statements can be represented as "if p, then q and if q, then r." (False)
Her conclusion is true. (True)
Step-by-step explanation:
p = Two lines are perpendicular
q = They intersect at Right angles.
Given: A and B are perpendicular
Conclusion: A and B intersect at right angle.
According to the law of detachment, There are two premises (statements that are accepted as true) and a conclusion. They must follow the pattern as shown below.
Statement 1: If p, then q.
Statement 2: p
Conclusion: q
In our case the pattern is followed. The truth of the premises logically guarantees the truth of the conclusion. So her conclusion is true and valid.
Answer:
K(-1)=6
Step-by-step explanation:
t=-1
2 times -1 squared
-1 squared=1
2x1 = 2
2+4=6
K(-1)=6
C because you multiply both sides by 5 and get d>20
It can be concluded that ΔWXY is equivalent to ΔBCD by the SAS rule because the corresponding sides and corresponding angle are congruent. Option D
<h3>What is SAS congruency?</h3>
SAS congruency states that two triangles are said to be congruent if any two sides or angle between the sides of one triangle are equal to the corresponding two sides and also the angle between the sides of the second triangle.
Thus, it can be concluded that ΔWXY is equivalent to ΔBCD by the SAS rule because the corresponding sides and corresponding angle are congruent. Option D
Learn more about SAS theorem here:
brainly.com/question/18922904
#SPJ1
1 gallon = 128 fluid ounces
25 cups x 12 ounces = 300 total ounces needed
300 / 128 = 2.34 gallons needed
he will need to buy C. 3 bottles
