It would be 32 x 12 because there are 12 inches per feet. So the answer would be 384 inches per sec squared. If this is right could you possibly give me brainliest? Hope this helped.
Answer: First of all, we will add the options.
A. Yes, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
B. Yes, because the regression equation is based on a random sample.
C. Yes, because the association between length and weight is positive.
D. No, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
E. No, because there may not be any 3-inch fish of this species in the pond.
The correct option is D.
Step-by-step explanation: It would not be appropriate to use the model to predict the weight of species that is 3 inches long because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
As we can see from the question, the model only accounts for species that are within the range of 0.75 to 1.35 inches in length, and species smaller or larger than that length have not been taken into consideration. Therefore the model can not be used to predict the weights of fishes not with the range accounted for.
Answer:
1/2y > 22
Step-by-step explanation:
This can also be written as
y/2 > 22
and
0.5y >22
Hope this helps!
The answer would be 53. This can be found by add 127 twice (xy and uz) and subtracting it from 360. This would give you 106 and you would divide it by 2 for the 2 angles left and get the answer.
