When comparing the two texts we can see that both talk about ancestry and culture. In addition, both emphasize foreign words that signal their ancestry, anecdotes that make the text more dynamic, and the use of pathos that highlights the public's sentimentality.
<h3>What differences do the two texts present?</h3>
- Anaya's text has a critical tone.
- Nye's text has a more friendly tone.
Both Anaya and Nye use their texts to show how there are many different cultures and languages in America that should be valued and respected regardless of their location.
Anaya shows that this is not always followed by American society, which insists on suppressing and censoring cultures that are considered inferior and unworthy.
Nye recognizes that this lack of respect for many cultures is real among Americans, but that doesn't mean society can't change once they allow themselves to know those cultures without judgment.
This question is about the texts “Take the Tortillas out of Your Poetry” and “Speaking Arabic” and you can learn more about them at the link:
brainly.com/question/6755302
#SPJ1
