Answer:
first time I knew she was missing was in the morning,I called her to come down stairs for the breakfast but I got no reply, after that I went upstairs to check on her and of course I found no one except a letter written by her saying that she had enough and it's the Time for her be independent,I called her phone number but I had hi answer .
I hope the police will more than great to find my sister.
Answer:
No, The women were not justified in hiding the evidence.
Explanation:
In the book, "Trifles", by Susan Glaspell, she narrates a murder incident involving a couple. The couple were Mr. and Mrs. John Wright. John Wright was described as a temperamental man who subdued his wife. Mrs. Wright had just been arrested by the police for the suspicious murder of her husband. Two police officers, accompanied by their wives, Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters came to the house to investigate the scene and collect evidence. The women came to the house with the intention of bringing a change of clothes for Mrs. Wright who was now in custody. There, they found evidence that Mrs. Wright likely killed her husband.
One of the pieces of evidence was the wrung neck of Mrs. Wrights canary which they believed was killed by Mr. Wright. They were thus convinced that Mrs Wright was being ill treated by Mr. Wright prompting her to kill her husband. They then conceal the evidence from their husbands.
Though this act was out of compassion for the woman, it was wrong for the following reasons;
- The law is supposed to take its course.
- Mrs Wright was supposed to seek help or annul the marriage when it was being detrimental to her rather than resort to murder which is an offence to the law.
- A lawyer would have also helped Mrs. Wright even if the evidence was submitted.
- Not submitting the evidence also makes it seem like the women supported the crime.
Answer:
Two or more Independent Clauses.
Explanation:
It must contain at least two or more followed along with a comma, semicolon or conjuction. Independent clauses has a subject and a verb and forms a complete thought.
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
This sentence uses correct pronoun-antecedent agreement. A pronoun is a word that modifies a noun. In this example, the pronoun is he. The antecedent is a word that refers to a noun or a pronoun and appears before the pronoun in the sentence. In this case, the antecedent is referring to he and is Damien.