Less than the bond interest payment
Answer:
Return on stock will be 12.65%
So option (c) will be the correct option
Explanation:
We have given expected return in booming economy = 22 %
Expected return in normal economy = 11 %
Expected return in recessionary economy = 4%
Probability of boom = 24% = 0.24
probability of normal economy = 67%=0.67
Probability of recession = 9 % =0.09
So Expected return on stock = (Return in boom economy x Probability of boom economy) + (Return in normal economy x Probability of normal economy) +(Return in recessionary economy x Probability of recessionary economy)
Expected return on stock = (0.22 x 0.24) + (0.11 x 0.67) + (-0.04 x 0.09)
= 0.0528 + 0.0737 = 0.1265 = 12.6%
So option (c) will be the correct option
Answer:
The answers are Horizontal and Vertical respectively.
Explanation:
Horizontal integration refers to the expansion strategy adopted by the corporations which involves acquisition of one company by another company where both the companies are in the same business line and at same value chain supply level, whereas, Vertical integration refers to the expansion strategy adopted by the corporations where one company acquire another company who is at the different level, usually at the lower level of its value chain supply process.
<span>In order to compute the gestational age of their
fetus by determining the time of last menstrual period. Gestational age is also
called the menstrual age which measures the age of the fetus. Gestational age
is usually being computed by the date of the last menstrual period of the
mother and by doing an obstetric ultrasound to verify the size of the fetus and
thru this it can estimate the gestation age of the fetus. </span>
Answer:
The answer is: Duncan's materials costs per unit was $1.50 ($6.10 - $4.60) less than Davis's materials costs per unit.
Explanation:
We must first calculate the materials costs for both companies:
- Duncan's total costs was $457,250 minus conversion costs of $279,000 equals total materials costs of $178,250.
-
Davis's total costs was $721,056 minus conversion costs of $381,408 equals total materials costs of $339,648
.
Now we calculate the materials costs per unit produced:
- Duncan's total materials costs $178,250 divided by 38,750 units equals $4.60 per unit.
- Davis's total materials costs $339,648 divided by 55,680 units equals $6.10 per unit.
So Duncan's materials costs per unit was $1.50 ($6.10 - $4.60) less than Davis's materials costs per unit.
.
