We must write a hypothetical sentence based on each of the given situations. We can do it as follows:
1. If she had had a dress, she would have gone to the party.
2. If she didn't hate school, she would study hard.
- We are using two types of conditional above: second and third conditionals.
- Sentence 1 uses the third conditional, which describes a hypothetical situation in the past. That means it is impossible to happen.
- Example: <u>If you had called me, I would have helped you</u>. - This cannot happen anymore. You didn't call, so I didn't help.
- Sentence 2 uses the second conditional, which describes a situation that can happen, but most likely will not.
- Example: <u>If I didn't have homework to do, I would come with you</u>. - I have homework to do. I can come with you, but it would not be a good idea.
- The second conditional uses the simple past and would/could/might.
- The third conditional uses the past perfect and would have/could have/ might have.
Learn more about the topic here:
brainly.com/question/19258518?referrer=searchResults
I can better help you if you list the options
they are referring to the opposition of "tabula rasa", its the idea people are born without built in mental content, we develop it over time. as well as we dont have personalities or ideas when we are born, but the the molded by our experiences <span />
If you are asking for the definition and that is one of your choices then yes, you are correct.
