The reason why commodity futures contracts are transferable is: <span>They can be bought and sold but the obligation in the contract remains valid.
Commodity futures contract is an agreement to buy or sell a specific asset at a specific price somewhere in the future.
This contract does not specify the name of the person who should buys the asset, so it could be transferable as long as the exchange is still fuiflled.
</span>
Answer:
a. $1,290,000
b. $3.80
Explanation:
a. The computation of the net income is shown below:
= Net income - preference dividend
= $1,500,000 - $210,000
= $1,290,000
b. The earning per share is shown below:
= (Net income) ÷ (weighted-average shares of common stock)
= ($1,290,000) ÷ (340,000 shares)
= $3.80
Simply we apply the net income formula after considering the preference dividend and then earning per share is computed
Answer:
$2,317,000
Explanation:
The computation of the weighted-average accumulated expenditures for interest capitalization purposes is shown below:
For expenditure on March 1
= $1,932,000 × 10 months ÷ 12 months
= $1,610,000
On June 1
= $1,212,000 × 7 months ÷ 12 months
= $707,000
On December 31, it would be zero
So, the accumulated expenditures is
= $1,610,000 + $707,000
= $2,317,000
Answer:
Variable cost per unit = $64 per unit
so correct option is b. $64
Explanation:
given data
sold Arks = 14,000 units
sold Bins = 56,000 units
products unit selling price unit variable cost unit contibution
Arks $120 $80 $40
Bins 80 60 20
to find out
Carter Co.'s variable cost
solution
we get here Variable cost per unit find as
Variable cost per unit = ( Arks unit variable cost × sold Arks + Bins unit variable cost × sold Bins ) ÷ total sales
Variable cost per unit = 
Variable cost per unit = $64 per unit
so correct option is b. $64
Answer:
Optimal qauntity is 4 Units
Explanation:
Here, we have to decide quantity of production at which maximum profit can be generated. For this reason we will have to contruct a table which will help us to calculate Marginal Benefit and Marginal cost. This table is given as under:
Quantity Total benefit Marginal benefit Total Cost Marginal Cost
0 Units 0 0 0 0
1 Units 16 16 9 9
2 Units 32 16 20 11
3 Units 48 16 33 13
4 Units 64 16 48 15
5 Units 80 16 65 17
We can see that at 4 Units, marginal revenue is almost equal to marginal cost. At this level of production, we have maximum benefits generated which is:
Maximum Benefit Generated = ($16 - $9) + ($16 - $11) + ($16 - $13) + ($16 - $15) = $7 + $5 + $3 + $1 = $16 for 4 Units
We can also cross check by considering 5 units case to assess whether the benefit generated is more than 4 units case or not.
Maximum Benefit Generated (For 5 Units) = ($16 - $9) + ($16 - $11) + ($16 - $13) + ($16 - $15) + ($16 - $17) = $7 + $5 + $3 + $1 - $1 = $15 for 4 Units
As the maximum benefit generated in the case of 4 units is more because of using marginal revenue = Marginal Cost relation, hence the optimal quantity is 4 units.