1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ivahew [28]
2 years ago
14

It is difficult to implement both of these policies at the same time because reducing taxes on private spending has the effect o

f increasing the government budget deficit.
a. True
b. False
Business
1 answer:
Serga [27]2 years ago
7 0

It’s true that implementing both of them at the same time would be difficult because lowering taxes on personal purchases results in a bigger government budget.

Investment can rise through lowering taxes on individual savings or by reducing the public debt. However, unless other taxes are raised or government spending is decreased, lowering taxes on private savings has the consequence of widening the government budget deficit. Therefore, it's challenging to participate in both at once.

Growth in aggregate demand is probably going to result from increased government spending (AD). In the short run, this may result in greater growth.

Depending on which area of government spending is increased, higher government spending will also affect the supply-side of the economy. Spending directed toward infrastructure development may boost productivity and expand the long-term aggregate supply.

Learn more about Government budget here brainly.com/question/4514203

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
New Business is just being formed by 10 investors, each of whom will own 10% of the business. The firm is expected to earn $500,
Triss [41]

Answer:

additional income is $11050  if the business is organized as a partnership rather than as a corporation

Explanation:

given data

investors = 10

own = 10%

earn =  $500000

corporate tax rate = 34%

personal tax rate = 35 %

to find out

How much additional spendable income

solution

we find here first income if formed as corporation in hand  that is

income if formed as corporation = earn × own ( 1 -  corporate tax ) × ( 1 - personal tax )

income if formed as corporation = 500000 × 10% ( 1 - 34% ) × ( 1 - 35% )

income if formed as corporation =$21450

and

income will be taxable if form partnership that is

income if formed partnership = earn × own ( 1 - personal tax )

put here value

income if formed partnership = 500000 × 10% ( 1 - 35% )

income if formed partnership = $32500

so

additional income is $32500 - $21450

additional income is $11050

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is not true of taxable asset purchases?
shutvik [7]

Answer:

e. None of the above

Explanation:

The taxable asset purchases allows the individual to increase or step up the tax basis of acquired assets so as to reflect the price of the purchases made.

If one buy an assets, then he or she wants to allocate total purchase price in a way which gives a favorable postacquisition tax results.

In case of taxable asset purchases, the tax credits or the net operating losses cannot be transferred from the target firm to the acquiring firm.

6 0
3 years ago
Sadie sold 10 shares of stock to her brother, George, for $500 16 months ago. Sadie had purchased the stock for $600 two years e
wlad13 [49]

Answer:

there is gain and  receive is $100 long term gain

Explanation:

given data

Sadie sold = 10 shares

Sadie sold shares of stock = $500

time = 16 year ago

Sadie purchased the stock = $600

time = 2 year earlier

George sells  stock = $700

to find out

amount and character of his recognized gain or loss in the current year

solution

we know that George receives dual basis in the stock

his loss  = $600 - $500 = $100

and

if we consider stock is sold at a gain

then  George receives a carryover basis = $600

and

if we consider stock is sold at a loss

then  George receives  = $500

also here his sister basis and holding period is transfer to her brother

so we can say there is gain

and receive is = proceed - carryover basis

receive is = $700 - $600

receive is $100 long term gain

5 0
3 years ago
swenson Saws produces bows, frame, dovetail, and tenon saws used by craft furniture makers. During an 8-hour shift, a saw is pro
RUDIKE [14]

Answer:

Given: Total shift time = 8 hours = 8 * 60 = 480 minutes

time required for production of one saw = 6 minutes

Demand for Bow saw = Demand for frame saw = Demand for dovetail saw = 1/2 * Demand of Tenon saw

a) Mixed model schedule:

Mixed model schedule

Product no. per batch

Bow Saw 1

Frame Saw 1

Dovetail Saw 1

Tenon Saw 2

Total 5

Therefore 2 Tenon Saw, and each bow, frame, and dovetail saws will be produced before the cycle is repeated.

b) 2 Tenon Saw, 1 bow, 1 frame, and 1 dovetail saws will be produced under production sequence for one unit production.

The length of cycle will be 5*6=30 minutes i.e. the cycle will repeat once in 30 minutes for 8 hours means totally it will repeat 16 times during one shift.

c) Number of saws Swenson produce in one shift = Number of Bow saw Swenson produce in one shift + Number of Frame saw Swenson produce in one shift + Number of Dovetail saw Swenson produce in one shift + Number of Tenon saw Swenson produce in one shift

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does the Lorenz Curve illustrate about the economy?
Alex_Xolod [135]

Answer:

Lorenz curve can be understood as a graphical representation of distribution of wealth or income among the population in a given economy.

Explanation:

Lorenz Curve was proposed by Max O. Lorenz in the year 1905 to represent inequality in the distribution of income among the given population. This curve illustrates that the distribution of wealth is not equal, where one section of the population has all the wealth or income of the economy and the other section of the population is left with none. Whereas in the case of perfect equality, each section of the population should receive an equal amount of wealth of the economy. This means that N% of the society should always have N% of income and not more and not less than that. Thus, this situation is hypothetical and thus, the idea of the Lorenz Curve comes into consideration.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Suppose Jacques and Kyoko are playing a game in which both must simultaneously choose the action Left or Right. The payoff matri
    5·1 answer
  • An otr® asks a client with impaired balance to dust and polish a bookshelf in standing position without upper-extremity support.
    14·1 answer
  • The balance sheet of Indian River Electronics Corporation as of December 31, 2020, included 12.25% bonds having a face amount of
    14·1 answer
  • Assume that a Parent owns 80 percent of a Subsidiary that has 6 percent preferred stock outstanding with a reported par value of
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following situations may qualify a taxpayer to claim an education credit on their tax return? g
    7·1 answer
  • Cubie Corporation has provided the following data concerning its only product: Selling price$97per unit Current sales 10,300unit
    5·1 answer
  • If you could choose anything to be? (must be in essay)​
    7·1 answer
  • Assume the corporate tax view of capital structure. Your unleveraged cost of capital is 13%. Your corporate tax rate is 30%. You
    11·1 answer
  • What's 1+1?<br> P.s you get 20 points LOL
    9·1 answer
  • A 30-year $185,000 amortized mortgage loan has a fixed interest rate of 4.375% and fixed monthly payments. The monthly payment i
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!