British, Spanish, French (I think)
Yuri <span>Alekseyevich </span>Gagarin
Answer:
C). Scientists intentionally obscuring research data to make it difficult for non-scientists to understand their results.
Explanation:
As per the question, the scientists' deliberate obliteration of research data can not be a factor in misrepresentation of the data in media as it is intentionally made to make the results tough to be understood by the non-scientists and has no affiliation to media misunderstanding the data. While the other phrases display the key causes of misinterpretation by media like 'reporter's lack of understanding of the topic' will lead him/her to overstate the results', 'misconceiving a scientific terminology' may lead to misreporting the information', and 'the time and space limitation by the media' may result in manipulation of the data.' Thus, <u>option C</u> exemplifies the phrase that cannot be a factor in misrepresentation by media.
Answer:
C. a strict division of power among levels of government
Explanation:
Having a federal system of government allows the government to create a clear line between the authority of the federal government and the authority of the state. This is done by the division of the responsibility of the states and the federal government. It provides a centralized system based on equality but has a very limited space for experimentation at state levels. Hence, the option that a strict division of power among levels of government is a consequences of the federal system in the United States is correct.
The Case of Near v. Minessota was a decision made by the United States Supreme Court and ruled that prior restraints on publications was a violation of freedom of the press that was protected under the First Amendment. This ruling was made for The Saturday Press newspaper, which had an restraint on the basis on antisemtism and anti blacks sentiments. Even though it was unethical for them to publish those prints, even at the time (1931) they still had the right to do so. It was determined that the only time that the government could interfere with the publication of news was that if the article revealed secrets of the State.
Hope this helps!
