1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
NNADVOKAT [17]
1 year ago
9

What is a main difference between trial courts and appellate courts ?

Law
1 answer:
White raven [17]1 year ago
4 0

The difference between the Trial courts and Appellate courts is that the Trial courts answer questions of fact, whereas the Appellate courts tend to answer questions of law.

Appellate Courts advocacy tends to sometimes looks cool, but not so, as it is one which has to envisage the intricacies of the proceedings which happened before the Trial courts and then, he or she can find out actual errors in the reasoning of the trial court.

The appellate courts tend to not retry the cases or hear any new evidence. As, here they are said to not hear any given witnesses testify. Thus, here there is no jury.

Hence, it is said that the Appellate courts tends to review the procedures and the decisions in the trial court.

To learn more about the Appellate Courts here:

brainly.com/question/29766399

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
The 4 main crime theories are as follows: Classical, Sociological, Biological, and (Blank).
maks197457 [2]

Answer:

Interactionist.

Explanation:

According to GOOGLE, <u>"Theories of Crime: Classical, Biological, Sociological, Interactionist. There are four basic theories of crime, and knowing and understanding each one is imperative for one to succeed in any legal profession."</u>

6 0
3 years ago
Two young college students Juan and Carole, are discussing the topic of capital punishment. They have opposing views on the subj
kobusy [5.1K]

Answer:

The answer is: Stage 6 of "Reflective Reasoning"

Explanation:

The Reflective Judgment Model is used in order to describe how people from adolescence going to adulthood develop <u>"reasoning." </u>This framework consists of<em> 7 stages</em>. These stages are categorized under three kinds of thinking<em> (Pre-Reflective Reasoning, Quasi-Reflective Reasoning and Reflective Reasoning). </em>

The situation above falls under "Stage 6 of Reflective Reasoning." Under this stage,<u><em> "reflective thinking"</em></u> is considered. So, people in this stage know that<em> knowledge is not certain nor absolute,</em> thus they try to compare their opinion with others. Just like Carole and Juan above, even though they have opposing views, Carole understands Juan's opinion.

Thus, this explains the answer.

3 0
4 years ago
I dunno but read this : THIS IS FOR YOUR SAFETY, PLEASE READ! ⚠️ There is a Mickey Mouse profile that will dm (direct message) y
andreev551 [17]

Answer:

THANKS FOR THE WARNING

Explanation:

sorry for the caps lol

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In order to obtain a search warrant, a law enforcement officer must show probable cause by reasonably establishing three issues.
Nastasia [14]

Answer:

C. Evidence of the crime exists.

Explanation:

8 0
4 years ago
Which of the following statements about victim advocates is true? They work mostly in murder cases, where the victim can’t speak
mart [117]

Answer:

they work mostly in murder cases

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Timmy has been imprisoned for theft. He is worried about his three children, who are dependent on him. His attorney tells him th
    13·1 answer
  • 3.
    11·2 answers
  • Why was it difficult or impossible for the government of the United States
    10·2 answers
  • Describe the political behavior of a person with low political efficiency.
    6·2 answers
  • What do all law enforcement agencies need in order to be prepared for a case involving forensic entomology
    6·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP! 70 POINTS!
    6·1 answer
  • I need a reflection of civil contracts
    14·1 answer
  • Please answer quick will give brainliest
    12·2 answers
  • Law......................................
    5·1 answer
  • B) What important tradeoffs must the architects of constitutions consider when they think about how they will empower government
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!