1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
hjlf
3 years ago
8

Question 15 (True/False Worth 2 points)

Law
1 answer:
polet [3.4K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

TRUE

Explanation:

HOPE IT WILL HELP YOU

You might be interested in
Which of these political stances would not align with the Democratic party
Ber [7]

Answer:

Girl what

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. Is Defensible Space Theory a logical explanation for controlling crime? Why or why not?
Kaylis [27]

Answer:

See explaination

Explanation:

1. The Defensible Space Theory can really be seen as a logical explanation for controlling crime from the perspectives of a defender as well as an attacker. This theory makes use of the science of psychology with the science of meaningful space. When the defender, that is, the home owners will be responsible for their home space, the sense of responsibility will be higher on the same. The home owners will be accountable for their defense. This encourages home owners to design their home space in such a way that they will be able to control their environment based on their present capabilities like family structure, income level, and socioeconomic status. The attacker, that is, the potential criminal will feel insecure and uncomfortable on a highly defended land. So, the probability of the criminal attacking the home space or neighborhood may be lessened. This argument is supported by the study which involved private homes in two high-crime areas in St. Louis. These areas recorded lower crimes than public areas using the Defensible Space Theory.

2. According to the Routine Activity Theory, the condition for crime is the presence of a suitable target(s) and the absence of a guardian(s). It is important to note that something or the other will always be present to motivate potential offenders to commit crime. So, there will always be motivated offenders. If motivated offenders are present, so suitable targets will be present in the society on the other side for crime to take place. So, suitable targets cannot be left unguarded which will increase the probability of crime, considering the target is in an isolated position. Even a weak guardian is sometimes equivalent to no guardian or protector. So, I think, presence of guardian(s), more specifically, more capable guardian(s) plays the greatest role at reducing

8 0
3 years ago
What are the FDA criteria for therapeutic equivalence? Check all that apply.
Ne4ueva [31]

-clinical indication

-safety profile

-dosage form

-route of administration

6 0
3 years ago
I’m sooooooooooooooooooooo confused
cluponka [151]

Answer:

Public morals

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When you encounter an impaired road user, you should stay _____.
Lerok [7]
B . Behind them : impaired means to have a disability of a specific kind so being behind them you watch them
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is one norm that schools do NOT teach students ? A How to meet deadlines b How to be late for appointments c How to play wi
    11·1 answer
  • When can freedom of speech be restricted
    11·1 answer
  • Choose one of the 4 cases provided:
    14·1 answer
  • When law enforcement officers in many states suspect a driver is DUI or DWI, they can give a series of on-the-spot, roadside che
    8·1 answer
  • Hank is a computer forensics specialist. Upon arriving at a crime scene, what is his first task?
    13·2 answers
  • 4.<br> What is a substrate control? Why is it done?
    14·1 answer
  • What are the basic Hindu beliefs about
    7·2 answers
  • Why is gerrymandering a problem for the House of Representatives but not the Senate? A. Members of the House are more influenced
    7·2 answers
  • Don't use such phrases here, not cool! It hurts our feelings :(
    8·2 answers
  • Look at Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015).
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!