For the year ended December 31, 2018, the warranty-related entry would include a debit to warranty expense of $80,000.
If it's miles impracticable to determine the cumulative impact of applying a trade-in accounting principle, then the new accounting principle should be applied prospectively as of the earliest date practicable. in this situation, the disclosures discussed in FSP 30.4.
Cumulative effect equals the difference between the actual retained profits suggested at the beginning of the yr using the antique approach and the retained income that would have been reported at the start of the year if the brand-new technique had been utilized in earlier years.
Learn more about warranty here brainly.com/question/14227081
#SPJ4
Answer:
Demand
Consumer interference
Explanation:
The social demand curve represents the benefit of demand to the whole society whereas the normal demand curve represents the benefits to the consumers only. The demand curve represents the social cost curve and the market failure is analyzed by the customer interference.
Answer:
The benefits of a High Speed Rail in California:
- It becomes a feasible alternative to air travel, because it can be either cheaper, or even faster, since passengers do not have to spend as much time on a train station as they do on an airport.
- If demand is high enough, state highways can become less congested, because many people who would otherwise travel by car, would take a high speed train instead.
- Because the trains are electric, they are likely to help reduce pollution.
The cons would be:
- We cannot know for sure how many people would take the high speed trains. Demand could not be high enough to justify the cost.
- The line would be very costly.
- It could end up benefit only a small section of the population who would take the trains, or who travel often.
I believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks, as can be seen in most countries where high speed lines have been made between large cities. For example, in Spain, the line between Madrid and Barcelona is profitable. The same would likely happen for a line between Los Angeles and San Francisco.
What are the implications of starting a project based on tenuous projections that may or may not come true 10 years from now?
If demand projections are tenous, there is always the possiblity that the high speed line could not be profitable. However, this risk can be lowered if the line is made between highly populated cities.
Could you justify the California high-speed rail project from the perspective of a massive public works initiative?
Yes, a high speed rail would be a project that could massively impact California. The benefits of its operation could outweight the cost.
In other words, what other factors enter into the decision of whether to pursue a high-speed rail project?
As I said before, the most important factor is to construct line between highly populated cities in order to reduce the risk of not having enough demand. It has been demonstrated around the world, in Spain, in Italy, in Japan, in China, that high speed lines that connect very populated regions, can be profitable.
The <u>ASVAB </u><span>is a multiple choice examination that evaluates the skills of the applicants for enlistment in the US military.
ASVAB is short for Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery, and refers to a test that determines whether a person taking it is suitable for the army. High school students can take this test starting from the 10th grade, and if they pass it, they can join the army when they become of age.</span>
Answer:
a. 9.43%
Explanation:
IRR is the rate of return that makes initial investment equal to present value of cash inflows
Initial investment = Annuity*[1 - 1 /(1 + r)^n] /r
1250 = 325 * [1 - 1 / (1 + r)^5] /r
Using trial and error method, i.e., after trying various values for R, lets try R as 9.43%
1250 = 325 * [1 - 1 / (1 + 0.0943)5] /0.0943
1250 = 325 * 3.846639
1250 = 1,250
Therefore, The project IRR is 9.43%
