All categories

1 year ago

Over the last 70-80 years, which of these investments has provided the highest returns? gold stocks gold bonds antique shoes

Business

1 answer:

zloy xaker [14]1 year ago

3 0

Over the last 70-80 years, Gold bonds investment has provided the highest returns.

Gold bond have advantages over physical gold. A sovereign gold bond is a better investment than physical gold because of many reasons

The stock market has long been considered the source of the highest historical returns. Higher returns come with higher risk. Stock prices are more volatile than bond prices. Stocks are less reliable in shorter time periods. The stock market has proven that it produces higher gains over long time periods compared to bonds.

For example, one hundred dollars invested in the Standard & Poor's 500 Index (S&P 500) in 1928 would have been worth more than $700,000 by 2021. In comparison, the same $100 invested in 10-year Treasuries.

Learn more about Investments and Returns here:

brainly.com/question/16789482

#SPJ4

You might be interested in

The accounting principle that requires that the cost flow assumption be consistent with the physical movement of goods is:a. cal

grigory [225]

Answer: C nonexistent; that is, there is no such accounting requirement.

Explanation: there is no accounting

assumption that requires that the cost flow be consistent with the physical movement of goods.

Instead, the movement of money (real or virtual) is tracked using a cash flow statement; income and profit matches revenues to the timing of when products/services are delivered—a company’s net income can actually be materially different from its cash flow.

4 0

3 years ago

Darden Corporation uses the weighted-average method in its process costing system. The first processing department, the Welding

nexus9112 [7]

Answer:

$7.830

Explanation:

Calculation for the cost per equivalent unit for conversion costs for the month

First step is to compute for the Unit transferred out =

Unit transferred out = 21,400+101,000-34,000

Unit transferred out = 88,400

Second step is to compute for the Equivalent unit of conversion

Equivalent unit of conversion = 88,400+(34,000*70%)

Equivalent unit of conversion = 88,400+23,800

Equivalent unit of conversion = 112,200

Last step is to compute for the Cost per equivalent unit of conversion

Cost per equivalent unit of conversion = (24,700+853,880)/112,200 = 7.931

Cost per equivalent unit of conversion = 878,580/112,200

Cost per equivalent unit of conversion = $7.830

Therefore the cost per equivalent unit for conversion costs for the month is closest to $7.830

5 0

3 years ago

If a new home can be constructed for $150,000, what is the opportunity cost of federal defense spending, measured in terms of pr

FrozenT [24]

Answer:

4 million houses

Explanation:

Opportunity cost is the forfeited benefit as a result of choosing one option over others. Its value equals the cost of the next best alternative.

The cost of constructing a new home is $150,000. If the Federal Defence has a budget of $600 billion, the opportunity cost of spending that amount will be the equivalent number of units that can be built by the amount.

To calculate the number of units= $600 billion divided by $150,000

= $600,000,000,000/ $150,000

=4,000,000

=4 million units

6 0

3 years ago

Difference between accounts payable and accounts receivable

algol13

Payable=outcome
receive=Income

8 0

3 years ago

Under which conditions, according to the Porter five-forces model, can a supplier group gain power?

Tasya [4]

Answer:

b. When there is a lack of importance of the buyer to the supplier group

Explanation:

According to Porter there are five forces that can cause rivalry in a production industry. These are supplier power, threat of new entrants, buyer power, threat of substitutes, and degree of rivalry.

Supplier power is when suppliers are able to benefit from the producers by increasing prices of inputs and gaining some industry profit. Since suppliers supply input and labour to the producer they have a greater control of there is lack of importance of the buyer to the supplier group.

This means that the supplier group has more control on price and quality it supplies to the buyer with buyer having little choice but to buy.

If however buyer is more important to the supplier it means they can control price and quality of inputs

8 0

3 years ago