<h3>
Answer: False</h3>
Explanation:
The number 
(read out as "pi") is approximately 3.14
So 
On the other hand,
So we can see that the original claim is false because 
is <u>not</u> smaller than 
. It should be the other way around.
The slope is -1/4, which is -0.25x. We know that we are exactly 8 units to the left of the y axis, so we can use the slope to determine the change within the coordinates as the line moves across the graph. The slope has a rise of -1 and a run of 4, meaning every 4 units to the right will be 1 unit up. We must move 8 units to the right, which in turn moves the graph down 8 quarter units. 8 x (1/4) is 2, so we know that the graph has moved down 2 units. (Down because the graph has a negative slope). (-8,3)->(0,1). From this coordinate, we can see the y intercept is 1. Since y=mx+b, we can write y=-1/4x+1. This is your equation. (Sorry for the length, wanted to be thorough)
We assume you mean
.. f(x) = -3*x^3 -2
.. g(x) = -3*x^-3
Then
.. f(-3) = -3*(-3)^3 -2 = -3*(-27) -2 = 81 -2 = 79
.. g(4) = -3*4^-3 = -3/64
_____
It is helpful if you use ordinary lower-case letters for variables (except in some formulas where upper-case letters are used). The symbol "×" is used to signify multiplication, so leads to confusion when you try to use it for a variable. In plain text, the exponentiation operator is a caret (^), so x^2 means "x squared", for example. If the exponent is supposed to include an arithmetic operation, then it needs to be enclosed in parentheses, x^(3y-4), for example.
Answer:
No.............?
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
26ft
Step-by-step explanation:
This would form a triangle so you would use Pythagorean theorem to find the hypotenuse ( the longest side )
