Motivations for colonization: Spain's colonization goals were to extract gold and silver from the Americas, to stimulate the Spanish economy and make Spain a more powerful country. Spain also aimed to convert Native Americans to Christianity.
Spain was considered to have as three main goals behind its expeditions to North America: the expansion of its empire, the attainment of wealth, and the spread of Christianity. It is easily forgotten that monarchies were not possessed of endless wealth.
The Americans were quite selective, they tried not to engage in battle too often and sort of avoid British troops during the war as much as they could due to the fact that they were outmanned. In the South, they used the tactics of guerrilla warfare which worked to an extent. However, the war wasn't won until the French decided to help the Americans and helped them take the British Navy down.
Answer:
federal
Explanation:
Harriet lives under a federal system of government, usually characterized by the coming together of states in which the different member states have a certain degree of independent control of their internal affairs, with their external affairs being handled by a central government. The United States, Australia, and the Federal Republic of Germany operate a federal system of government.
The economic success of after ww1 were founded on a very fragile string. the industrialists were benefiting, while the workers conditions remained poor. This disparity resulted to a lot of goods chasing less money, which altogether led to a crash of the economy.the depression afected workers who lost their pension, and industrialists who made losses, and the banking sector.
Answer:
Legalism in Chinese Philosophy
First published Wed Dec 10, 2014; substantive revision Fri Nov 16, 2018
Legalism is a popular—albeit quite inaccurate—designation of an intellectual current that gained considerable popularity in the latter half of the Warring States period (Zhanguo, 453–221 BCE). Legalists were political realists who sought to attain a “rich state and a powerful army” and to ensure domestic stability in an age marked by intense inter- and intra-state competition. They believed that human beings—commoners and elites alike—will forever remain selfish and covetous of riches and fame, and one should not expect them to behave morally. Rather, a viable sociopolitical system should allow individuals to pursue their selfish interests exclusively in ways that benefit the state, viz. agriculture and warfare. Parallel to this, a proper administrative system should allow officials to benefit from ranks and emoluments, but also prevent them from subverting the ruler’s power. Both systems are unconcerned with individual morality of the rulers and the ruled; rather they should be based on impersonal norms and standards: laws, administrative regulations, clearly defined rules of promotion and demotion, and the like.
Legalist thinkers contributed greatly to the formation of China’s empire both on the theoretical level and as political practitioners; and many of their ideas continued to be employed throughout China’s history. Yet their derisive views of moralizing discourse of their rivals, their haughty stance toward fellow intellectuals, and their pronouncedly anti-ministerial rhetoric all gained them immense dislike among the imperial literati. From China’s second imperial dynasty, the Han (206/202 BCE–220 CE) on, the prestige of Legalism declined; only a few texts associated with this current survived intact; and even in the modern period, notwithstanding sporadic outbursts of interest in Legalism, this current has not received adequate scholarly attention.
Explanation:
sana po maka tulong
