1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
rosijanka [135]
4 years ago
14

Which was a result of the use of new weapons and methods of warfare during World War I??

History
1 answer:
miss Akunina [59]4 years ago
5 0
New weapons were introduced during World War I such as gas, aircraft, tank, submarine, machine gun, and telephone, was used against the enemies. As a result of using these new inhumane weapons, during World War I many people died than the previous wars. 
You might be interested in
Which of the following is NOT a cause of World War II?
Veronika [31]

Answer:

Worldwide depression is not a course of World war 2

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does regime mean ?
Tems11 [23]

a government, especially an authoritarian one.

8 0
3 years ago
Which empire was conquered by Hernan Cortés? A. Aztec B. Maya C. Olmec D. Inca
madam [21]
Hernan Cortes was a Spanish Conquistador who led an expedition that conquered the Aztec Empire and imperialized large parts of Mexico. Cortes conquered modern day Mexico on behalf of the Spanish kingdom of King of Castille in the 16th century. Cortes was a part of the early colonizers from the Spain who conquered and colonized large swaths of the Americas. The Spanish conquered enormous swaths of Latin and South America and the effects of this colonization can still be seen in the language, culture, and lifestyle of this region. 

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the allies win ww2?
N76 [4]
The best answer is:

"C" More troops.

They were better trained, more equipped, and definitely had a much larger quantity. 

I hope this helps!
~kaikers
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
This Supreme Court ruling stated slaves did not have a right to sue since they were not citizens, but merely property.
Alexxx [7]

Answer:

"Dred Scott Decision," which was very controversial.

Explanation:

DRED SCOTT DECISION where the Supreme Court ruling stated slaves did not have a right to sue since they were not citizens, but merely property.

These were their arguments.

Dred Scott:

When a person enters a free State or territory, the free status overrides the previous condition of servitude. Since slavery was forbidden in the free States and territories by

federal and State laws, Dred Scott became free when he entered Illinois and Wisconsin.

Sandford:

To deprive a person of property (in this case, Dred Scott) without due process or just compensation violated the 5th Amendment, which states that “No person shall be… deprived of life, liberty or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” Dred Scott was still a slave and no master's property rights could be limited or taken away by a State or federal law.

4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following occurred during bacons rebellion
    6·1 answer
  • Place each country with the correct alliance .
    6·1 answer
  • In america's version of federalism, power is shared ____
    5·2 answers
  • The answer to the question
    6·1 answer
  • According to "'Equal Justice Under Law': Thurgood Marshall," why did Marshall go to work for the NAACP? A. He wanted to earn a l
    6·1 answer
  • What part of the American population lived in or near poverty in 1929?
    15·1 answer
  • What is true about the Emancipation Proclamation?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes the economic situation in Bangladesh?
    15·1 answer
  • What was the course and the consequences of the Antietam
    14·1 answer
  • 10 points
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!