For 1: -19, -15, -14, -10, -8, -5, -4, 0, 3, and 5.
For 2: Sorenstam, Annika has the lowest score.
Well first we need to change the format of the equations to slope-intercept, or y=mx+b.
So the first one (x + y < 1) will be changed to y < -x + 1.
The second one (2y ≥ x - 4) will be changed to y <span>≥ x/2 - 2.
Now we can analyze each graph.
In every single graph the first equation (y < -x + 1) is graphed correctly.
Now for the second equation, we can see that only the first and last graph correctly format to the equation.
Now for the shading:
The first equation shows us that y is less than -x +1, making the shading go under the dotted line. (to the left)
The second equation shows us that y is greater than or equal to x/2 - 2, making the shading go above the line. (also to the left)
Therefore, when we shade, the overlapping shading is correctly formatted in the first graph.
Hope this helped, comment any questions you have for me.</span>
Hey! So, here's a tip. When writing exponents, an easier way is to write a^b, rather than a to the b power. Besides that, here is your answer!
So-------
9^3=729
3^2=9
6^3=216
15^2=225
Now that we have that figured out, we can add them together, wish is simple. 729 + 9 + 216 + 225= 1,179.
Therefore, your final answer will be 1,174.
If you have any questions on this, I'm happy to help you. :)
