1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
12345 [234]
1 year ago
10

British politician, Winston Churchill, said he wanted to 'strangle' the Bolsheviks at birth. Why do you think politicians across

Europe were so angry and scared of the Russian Revolution? ​
History
1 answer:
miss Akunina [59]1 year ago
5 0

Due to the enormity of the destruction and death caused by the Russian Revolution, politicians throughout Europe were enraged and terrified of it.

The United Kingdom's emergence following the First World War as a gravely crippled force to be reckoned with moderated English attitudes to the Revolution. The political classes were fundamentally hostile to the Revolution. With millions of people killed by war, fear, yearning, and illness in a remarkably short period of time, the scale of the death and obliteration associated with the Russian Revolution is essentially unmatched in modern history.

Numerous discourses in Western Europe's two-sided character were shaped by a belief in the communist goals of Political and social revolutions that occurred all over the country during the Russian Revolution.

Learn more bout Russian Revolution here: brainly.com/question/810738

#SPJ9

You might be interested in
Why did the conflict between cathlics and protestants begin in northern ireland
Andre45 [30]
 there is a lot of cathlics in northern ireland and they wanted to be in charge more and out there more and the protestants wanted that to but the cathlics thought they should have it more than the protestants because they were thier first    hopes this helps
6 0
3 years ago
in wich region of texas did the Jumano live? A. Great plains B.Gulf coastal plain C.mountain and basins region D.Central plains​
Charra [1.4K]

I think the answer is c

7 0
3 years ago
10 POINTS
netineya [11]

Answer:

Judicial review is the power of the courts to declare that acts of the other branches of government are unconstitutional, and thus unenforceable. For example if Congress were to pass a law banning newspapers from printing information about certain political matters, courts would have the authority to rule that this law violates the First Amendment, and is therefore unconstitutional. State courts also have the power to strike down their own state’s laws based on the state or federal constitutions.

Today, we take judicial review for granted. In fact, it is one of the main characteristics of government in the United States. On an almost daily basis, court decisions come down from around the country striking down state and federal rules as being unconstitutional. Some of the topics of these laws in recent times include same sex marriage bans, voter identification laws, gun restrictions, government surveillance programs and restrictions on abortion.

Other countries have also gotten in on the concept of judicial review. A Romanian court recently ruled that a law granting immunity to lawmakers and banning certain types of speech against public officials was unconstitutional. Greek courts have ruled that certain wage cuts for public employees are unconstitutional. The legal system of the European Union specifically gives the Court of Justice of the European Union the power of judicial review. The power of judicial review is also afforded to the courts of Canada, Japan, India and other countries. Clearly, the world trend is in favor of giving courts the power to review the acts of the other branches of government.

However, it was not always so. In fact, the idea that the courts have the power to strike down laws duly passed by the legislature is not much older than is the United States. In the civil law system, judges are seen as those who apply the law, with no power to create (or destroy) legal principles. In the (British) common law system, on which American law is based, judges are seen as sources of law, capable of creating new legal principles, and also capable of rejecting legal principles that are no longer valid. However, as Britain has no Constitution, the principle that a court could strike down a law as being unconstitutional was not relevant in Britain. Moreover, even to this day, Britain has an attachment to the idea of legislative supremacy. Therefore, judges in the United Kingdom do not have the power to strike down legislation.

Explanation:

nationalparalegal.edu /JudicialReview.aspx

6 0
3 years ago
Summary of article of the halftime show
Katen [24]

Answer:

A halftime show is a performance given during the brief period between the first and second ... This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material ...

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Place the events leading up to the French revolution in order
Gemiola [76]

Here's the chronological order, with dates:

1. The king's financial experts come up with ideas to relieve national debt.

  • That was ongoing in advance of convening the Estates General.  Charles de Calonne, appointed general controller of finances in 1783, recommended increasing taxation across the classes.  Jacques Necker was appointed to replace Calonne in 1788, and he would recommend a more limited monarchy in France, along the lines of the English model. Necker was dismissed from his position by the king in July, 1789.

2. The king asks that the Estates General convene  - January 24, 1789

3. The Third Estate forms the National Assembly  - June 14, 1789

4. The declaration known as the Tennis Court Oath is sworn  - June 20, 1789

5. The National Assembly passes the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen - August 26, 1789

6. The hated royal political prison, the Bastille, is captured - July 14, 1789

7. King Louis XVI is captured and then executed  

  • Captured while trying to flee France, June 1791
  • Executed, January 21, 1793.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 8. How old was Charles V when he became king of Spain in 1516?<br>​
    6·1 answer
  • What is an example of concurrent powers?
    13·1 answer
  • In 1517,luther post his 95th theses on the church door art wittenburg?
    10·1 answer
  • When Congress doesn't approve a president's choice for a federal court, this is an example of _______.
    8·2 answers
  • The Articles of Confederation were the first governing document of the new United States. One of the main reasons the Articles o
    11·2 answers
  • Multiple Choice
    9·1 answer
  • Please answer both questions please I really need help
    15·2 answers
  • In the 1800's, what law required Northerners to help return runaway slaves?
    15·1 answer
  • How did France,Spain,and England settle America differently?
    10·1 answer
  • What is one thing that the American government does that limits "freedom of the press"?
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!