Answer:
Proximity of effect
Explanation:
<u>Proximity of effect</u> is the social, psychological, cultural, or physical distance of a decision maker from those affected by his or her decisions and is one of the factors that need to be taken into account when determining the ethical intensity of an action.
Proximity of effect asserts that being too close to an employee will cause a leader, unit head, supervisor from being objective in the assessment of his employees and hence bad choices. This is due to the tendency of the supervisor to experience increased feeling of likeness for that employee and thus clouds his/her judgement.
The option that is an example of spillover costs is A. a manufacturer continues to pollute a river because it does not pay the costs for cleaning it.
<u>'Spillover costs' refers to a consequence that affects a third party that has not taken part in a decision</u>. In other words, 'spillover costs' makes reference to the damage provoked by another person to a third party. This idea is often used to talk about pollution, as it happens in option A). In this case,<u> the consequences of pollution experienced by the third party, who must pay the costs for cleaning pollution, are the spillover costs</u>.
Answer:
B) To let people know of his conversion to Buddhism
Explanation:
Edicts of Ashoka pillars in India are known as the first ever evidence of the existence of Buddhism. It was basically a way to let people know about Ashoka's conversion to Buddhism. Till now at least 150 Ashokan Edicts have been found on the rocks, cave walls, and pillars. It is believed that all of them were used to mark his kingdom.
Answer:
The crust is the upper part of the rigid lithosphere and is of different composition under land as opposed to the ocean floor. Below the rigid lithosphere, the mantle consists of hot rock with semi-liquid consistency, which slowly moves or flows. The outer core is molten, and the inner core is a dense solid.
Explanation:
Answer:
An affirmative defense of <u><em>Duress</em></u> implies an accused committed a criminal act in response to another’s volition (or will). Put simply, the defendant argues that someone made them commit the crime.
Explanation:
A duress can be described as a kind of affirmative defense. In this type of defense, the lawyer or attorney can argue that a defendant did something illegal due to extraordinary situations like somebody threatening them to do the illegal act. The attorney fights that in such a scenario, the defendant should not be held accountable for the act. Duress is a defense which can be used to justify an illegal act as the evidence shows that the culprit has caused the illegal act.
