1st Answer.<span>The captain wanted John to talk to the men and get then avoid mutiny for as long as possible.
2nd Answer.</span>Jim's first mad notion was when he stowed away on one if the boats going ashore the first Morning on the island.
3rd Answer.Jim witnessed long John stab and murder Tom.
4th Answer.The man of the island was Ben Gunn and he was marooned by the shipmates after telling them if the treasure and they though her was lying so they abandoned him.
PLEASE MARK THE ANSWER AS BRAINLIEST
<span>
</span>
Answer:
Hannah can ski really well and she often wins competitions.
Explanation:
Answer: the sound swells, as if altered by our quiet words to the proximity of live flesh. Whatever is making that clicking, I bet it could strip is to the bone in seconds
Circle 'the sound swells'
Underline "I bet it could strip is to the bone in seconds"
Yes there is a metaphor, the sound is being compared to quiet words to live flesh.
Explanation:
Appeal to emotion or argumentum ad passiones or appeal to feels is a logical fallacy characterized by the manipulation of the recipient's emotions in order to win an argument, especially in the absence of factual evidence.[1] This kind of appeal to emotion is a type of red herring and encompasses several logical fallacies, including appeal to consequences, appeal to fear, appeal to flattery, appeal to pity, appeal to ridicule, appeal to spite, and wishful thinking.
Instead of facts, persuasive language is used to develop the foundation of an appeal to emotion-based argument. Thus, the validity of the premises that establish such an argument does not prove to be verifiable.[2]
Appeals to emotion are intended to draw visceral feelings from the acquirer of the information. And in turn, the acquirer of the information is intended to be convinced that the statements that were presented in the fallacious argument are true; solely on the basis that the statements may induce emotional stimulation such as fear, pity and joy. Though these emotions may be provoked by an appeal to emotion fallacy, effectively winning the argument, substantial proof of the argument is not offered, and the argument's premises remain invalid.
