1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yKpoI14uk [10]
1 year ago
8

What details under “Social Upheaval”

History
1 answer:
Kamila [148]1 year ago
8 0

It can be inferred that the details under “Social Upheaval” that supports the idea that “terror and bewilderment” can cause people to respond in unusual or illogical ways is that Social Upheavals s are usually triggered by stringent economic or political conditions.

<h3>What was the Social Upheaval?</h3>

The term "social upheaval" refers to the disruption of social life in a civilization. War, starvation, economic restrictions, and tougher legal measures can all contribute to it. People will typically take to the streets to protest.

<h3>What was the catalyst for societal transformation in Europe?</h3>

Around 1760, the Industrial Revolution began, and it revolutionized people's social and economic life first in England, then in other European nations, and finally on other continents.

In Europe, several societal transformations occurred, including the Renaissance, the Protestant Reformation, and colonization.

Learn more about Social Upheaval:
brainly.com/question/13391889

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
What role did politics change global relations between countries in modern era?
AVprozaik [17]

Answer:The United States is today the only truly global power. Its military reach—whether on land, at sea, or in the air—extends to every point on the globe. Its economic prowess fuels world trade and industry. Its political and cultural appeal—what Joseph Nye has called soft power—is so extensive that most international institutions reflect American interests. America’s position in the world is unique—no other country in history has ever come close.

But is America’s exalted position sustainable? Militarily, the vast gap between the United States and everyone else is growing. Whereas defense spending in most other countries is falling, U.S. defense spending is rising rapidly. This year’s requested increase in defense spending is greater than the entire Chinese defense budget. Most remarkably, America can afford to spend more. Defense spending takes a smaller share of the U.S. gross domestic product than it did a decade ago—and even the Bush administration’s projected increases will produce an overall budget equal to only about 3.5 percent of GDP, about half of Cold War highs. There is little prospect of any country or group of countries devoting the resources necessary to begin competing with the United States militarily, let alone surpassing it.

Economically, the United States may not widen its edge over its competitors, but neither is it likely to fall behind. The U.S. economy has proven itself at least as adept as its major competitors in realizing the productivity gains made possible by information technology. Europe and Japan face severe demographic challenges as their populations rapidly age, creating likely labor shortages and severe budgetary pressures. China is modernizing rapidly, and Russia may have turned the corner, but their economies today are comparable in output to those of Italy and Belgium—and they have yet to develop a political infrastructure that can support sustained economic growth.

Which brings us to the issue of how to transform this unquestioned power into influence. Unless employed deftly, America’s military and economic superiority can breed resentment, even among its friends. A growing perception that Washington cares only about its own interests and is willing to use its muscle to get its way has fueled a worrisome gap between U.S. and European attitudes. European elites increasingly criticize the United States as being morally, socially, and culturally retrograde—especially in its perceived embrace of the death penalty, predatory capitalism, and fast food and mass entertainment. Europe has also begun to exercise diplomatic muscle in international institutions and other arenas, seeking to create new international regimes designed to limit America’s recourse to its hard power.

Explanation:

eptember 11 signaled the end of the age of geopolitics and the advent of a new age—the era of global politics. The challenge U.S. policymakers face today is to recognize that fundamental change in world politics and to use America’s unrivaled military, economic, and political power to fashion an international environment conducive to its interests and values.

For much of the 20th century, geopolitics drove American foreign policy. Successive presidents sought to prevent any single country from dominating the centers of strategic power in Europe and Asia. To that end the United States fought two world wars and carried on its four-decade-long Cold War with the Soviet Union. The collapse of the Soviet empire ended the last serious challenge for territorial dominion over Eurasia. The primary goal of American foreign policy was achieved.

During the 1990s, American foreign policy focused on consolidating its success. Together with its European allies, the United States set out to create, for the first time in history, a peaceful, undivided, and democratic Europe. That effort is now all but complete. The European Union—which will encompass most of Europe with the expected accession of 10 new members in 2004—has become the focal point for European policy on a wide range of issues. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization has evolved from a collective defense alliance into Europe’s main security institution. A new relationship with Russia is being forged.

Progress has been slower, though still significant, in Asia. U.S. relations with its two key regional partners, Japan and South Korea, remain the foundation of regional stability. Democracy is taking root in South Korea, the Philippines, Indonesia, and Taiwan. U.S. engagement with China is slowly tying an economically surging Beijing into the global economy.

5 0
2 years ago
One of the main reasons for European exploration was the desire to find a water route to
Andre45 [30]

The answer is C. North America

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Second Industrial Revolution in the United States resulted in the rapid growth of
Lana71 [14]
The second industrial revolution resulted in better government
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I need help in history asap!!!
Ede4ka [16]
1. the answer would be True

2 .the answer would be false

3 the answer is True

4 the answer is true

5.the answer would be false hope It help
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help! here is photo
Gnoma [55]
Number two would most likely be,
"If you met a federalist, you could assume that he was a supported of the constitution"
I'm not sure on the others, I'm sorry!!
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • E.e What was the population of india in 1978?
    13·1 answer
  • Where did the English seek to establish new settlements?
    14·2 answers
  • Acill 10 sıfat 10 zamirr
    13·1 answer
  • 99 POINTS
    15·2 answers
  • What were the names of the two plans created to set up the new government?
    11·1 answer
  • What is pro-slavery?
    8·2 answers
  • hi i want to say something real quick everyone is beautiful in their own way so don't take other bad words and don't let that kn
    15·2 answers
  • Who is george washington?
    11·2 answers
  • Which statement describes the legacy of William Tyndale?
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following is a alternate form of communism?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!