I would think 25% if you wiki the percentage you might get the answer.
Americans of European extraction and slaves contributed greatly to the population of growth in the Republic and state of Texas
<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2>
The setting she imparted to Tea Cake in Florida reverberates such a great amount with what we envision pursuing our fantasies would feel like. In the last part, she closes her story with Phoeby expressing that ". Dey gointuh make 'miration 'cause mah love didn't work lak they cherish.
If they ever had any" implying that no affection contrast with hers - she lived by her very own conditions, and is appreciative for Tea Cake taking her to her life's frame of reference. She could carry on with a satisfying life, free from the judgment of others. The general population in the town could talk all they need to, however they conceivably never experieced freedom like hers.
Personification because it’s giving human nature to the wind
Answer:
I would say the correct answer is B. To give the English king a graceful way out of what could be an awkward situation.
Explanation:
The emperor's letter is a perfect example of a well-balanced political message. <u>He clearly states his political position while still paying due respect to his counterpart.</u> Translated to modern, everyday English, this passage would mean: "Your request is unreasonable and goes against all principles and rules of my great empire; still, I will be gracious enough to assume that you meant no offence." This way, <u>the emperor turns down a request without making an enemy</u>.
True, the emperor refuses King George's request to intensify trade connections between the two countries. But he doesn't go so far as to warn the English king of anything. His tone remains polite throughout the letter. Therefore, A) isn't correct.
On the other hand, C) isn't correct because Qian Long presents his current political stance and the politics of his empire as definite and immutable. Therefore, there is no room for change - not now, not ever.
Finally, D) isn't correct because the emperor knows very well that an ambassador always speaks on behalf of his sovereign. Therefore, it is absolutely impossible that a political envoy would take liberty to speak on his own terms.