Answer:
Future value equals the present value multiplied by one plus the rate of interest in decimals.
Explanation:
Future value = present value x (1 + interest rate)
Interest rate = present value x interest rate
Answer:
Supplier dependence
Explanation:
When an entity finds itself in a situation where it has to rely on a particular supplier or provider of service for its business operations, either as a result of not being able to get an alternative supplier or the importance of the suppliers product to the entity, such is called supplier dependence.
It is very risky for an entity to depend on a particular source for input. This reverse order of an entity depending on the supplier for business strategy instead of the supplier depending on the entity is not a good business practice.
It’s easy for our own strategy to be determined by what our suppliers are doing. If we become too dependent, we risk having our strategy set by our suppliers rather than having them support our strategy. I’ve been thinking a lot here recently about how much suppliers can direct you
Answer:
E) existing factory has enough capacity to handle demand for the new products as well as the existing products.
Explanation:
If the existing factory doesn't have enough capacity to produce both the new product and existing ones, then if doesn't matter if the technology used is the same, or the new product is an extension of an existing product line, or existing human resources possess the abilities and knowledge required, or even if the product design is already complete or not.
If the factory's production capacity cannot handle the new product, then the company needs to expand the existing factory's production capacity or build a new facility.
Answer:
D, Flint can simply write ot the SEC to voice his concerns.
Explanation:
Since Flint does not have a case that warrants a court challenge but rather an observation, Flint can simply write to the SEC to intimate them about his observations and/or findings, as well as let the SEC know the position of his company on the rule being proposed by it.
Cheers.
