Ccc. ...........................
Answer:
The answer is Letter D.
Explanation:
They are large-scale customized initiatives with wide variations in tasks.
Because the process is reapted over and over again. It is always the same process with easier mechanization, higher quantity production, which allows faster continuous improvement.
Answer:
The partial labor and capital productivity figures for the parent and subsidiary is 5.03 units per hour, 1.37 units per hour and, 1.68 units per hour, 4.20 units per hour
Explanation:
The computation of the partial labor for the parent and subsidiary is calculated by applying the formula which is shown below:
= Sales ÷ Labor (hours)
For U.S = 100,080 units ÷ 19,880 hours = 5.03 units per hour
For LDC = 20,500 units ÷ 14,880 hours = 1.37 units per hour
The computation of the capital productivity for the parent and subsidiary is calculated by applying the formula which is shown below:
= Sales ÷ Capital equipment (hours)
For U.S = 100,080 units ÷ 59,400 hours = 1.68 units per hour
For LDC = 20,500 units ÷ 4,880 hours = 4.20 units per hour
Question Completion with options:
a. Past performance information provided directly by the offeror should not be relied upon.
b. The past performance evaluation satisfies the responsibility determination required under FAR subpart 9.1.
c. Evaluations should take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies.
d. Offerors with demonstrated past performance that is neither relevant nor recent must not be removed from further consideration for award.
Answer:
The statement that is true regarding the evaluation of the past performance is:
c. Evaluations should take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies.
Explanation:
It has been established that past performance is the best indicator of future performance. Past performance can predict future performance, behavior, and success. Organizations that achieve some good performance in the past build the required confidence, which will help them to forge ahead in the present and future. This is why in selecting companies for a negotiated competitive services acquisition, even the past performance of predecessor companies should be reviewed to get a better handle on the company's ability to deliver on the projects.