Answer:
Jefferson believed in the will of the people and he was against the corruption in public expenditures and elitism that could come from an elitist judiciary and powerful central government that would make unilateral decisions like the Louisiana Purchase.
Explanation:
Thomas Jefferson had a lot of faith in the will of the people and that was the premise for his philosophies on government. Jefferson believed in lowering expenditures in order to reduce corruption and to give the states a lot of power vis-a-vis the federal government because they were closer to the people. He was against the elitism of the Federalist party and tried to challenge this in appointments to the judiciary. Jefferson was very faithful to the Constitution and this led him to hesitate on the Louisiana Purchase because it was not stipulated in the Constitution that a president could purchase land on behalf of the country.
1. The Missouri Compromise - This states that Missouri would be admitted as a slave state and Maine would be admitted as a free state, to maintain the balance of slave vs. free states. But there was a line drawn on the 36-30 lines that divided the north as free and south as slave. This caused great debate among the northern states because of the fear of the south gaining more slave states.
The Wilmot Proviso - Stated that any new territory acquired by the US as result of the Mexican-American War, would outlaw slavery. This proviso would include most of the southwest and extend all the way to California. While this plan did not get passed, there was still great debate between the north and south over what the US would do with the new obtained territory.
The election of Abraham Lincoln - Running on an anti-slavery outlook, this created fear in the South in fear of losing their slaves. About a month after the election of Lincoln, South Carolina seceded from the Union.
2. John Brown was an abolitionist and wanted to spark a series of slave uprisings. While his actions were not the best way to end slavery, his intentions were. The raid was a major contributor to the start of the Civil War, so without it, slavery would have ended later in history than when it did end. So overall, the John Brown raid was effective in which it helped pushed the south to secede and the north pushing to end slavery.
3. The Civil War was inevitable because the issues on slavery was always a debate between the north and south. There were many times in history when the south had said they would secede from the union whenever slavery was being regulated or when they felt they were not being heard. What made the turn of events was when Lincoln was elected and when he supported an anti-slavery union, the south felt they were not properly represented by their president, so they seceded.
Answer:
B
Brutus suspects that Cassuis’s is fueled by intentions that will put him at risk and Cassius assures Bertos that he is honest and trustworthy
The correct answer is A) inflation.
<em>The economic result of the Civil War that affected both the North and the South was inflation.</em>
After the civil war, inflation was a real problem for both sides. The war heavily affected the North but the South suffered more than the North. The South used to base its economy on agriculture and slavery meanwhile the North had more industry. During the war, workers or farmers joined the armies and caused a decrease in supply. That is why prices rise in a fast way. That is the way to have inflation. The South had less cash than the North and tried to finance the war issuing war bonds and treasury notes but in reality, it had nothing to support the documents. The South decided to print money but it only caused more money in circulation, so the prices rose again.