1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vitfil [10]
3 years ago
8

Which characteristic made World War Il different from previous wars?

History
1 answer:
Elan Coil [88]3 years ago
3 0

The death toll was substantially higher for both civilians & military forces.

You might be interested in
In which way was the presidential election of 2008 unique in American history?
Alecsey [184]
The first black president was elected and this was the way in which the presidential election of 2008 was unique in American history. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the third option or option "C". I hope the answer comes to your help.
4 0
3 years ago
Moses tells Pharaoh to
xxMikexx [17]

Answer:

So now go.I am sending you to Pharaoh to bring my people the Israelites out of Egypt.But Moses said to God Who am i that i should go to Pharaoh and bring the Israelites out of Egypt?And God said,I will be with you.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who owned slaves first?<br> O Africans<br> Australians<br> O Europeans<br> O Native Americans
lora16 [44]

Answer:

african is ur answer

Explanation:

the first person to own slaves was anthony johnson he was a african so ur answer is african

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How different is the practice of anthropology in the 19th century with the 21st century
nataly862011 [7]

The anthropology of religion is the comparative study of religions in their cultural, social, historical, and material contexts.



The English term religion has no exact equivalent in most other languages. For example, burial practices are more likely to be called customs and not sharply differentiated from other ways of doing things. Early Homo sapiens (for example, the Neanderthals at Krapina [now in Croatia]) began burying their dead at least 130,000 years ago. To what end? And how and why have such practices changed over time? What might they have in common with the multitude of burial customs—known to be associated with differing conceptions of death and life—among people in the world today; for example, what might embalming practices in ancient Egypt and 19th-century Bolivia have in common with each other and with 21st-century embalming practices in North America? How do these relate to secondary burials, involving the exhumation and reburial of the corpse or its bones, as in Madagascar and Siberia, or rituals of cremation, as in Japan, India, or France? Paradoxically, anthropologists’ documentation of the enormous diversity of human customs, past and present, puts into question the very existence of “religion” as a single coherent system of practices, values, or beliefs. Indeed, what constitutes “religion” may be hotly debated even among coreligionists. The study of religion in anthropology requires consideration of all these matters, including anthropologists’ own terms of analysis.



Scholars of religion throughout the world have long recognized what the American philosopher and psychologist William James (1902) called “the varieties of religious experience.” Since the mid-19th century, one of the first and most important contributions of anthropologists has been to extend the study of those varieties beyond the formal doctrines and liturgies of established religious institutions to include related customs, regardless of when, where, and by whom they are practiced and whether they are celebrated, suppressed, or taken for granted. The anthropology of religion is the study of, in the words of the English anthropologist Edward Evans-Pritchard (Theories of Primitive Religion [1965]), “how religious beliefs and practices affect in any society the minds, the feelings, the lives, and the interrelations of its members…religion is what religion does.” Although Edward Burnett Tylor’s classic Primitive Culture (1871) documented the wide-ranging doings of his fellow Europeans, most anthropologists in the 19th and early 20th centuries focused on so-called primitive peoples living outside Europe and North America, on the grounds that religion, increasingly defined by contrast to reason, was a historically primitive form of behaviour that was already giving way to science. Subsequent research has proved these assumptions to be wrong. As anthropology has grown to include the study of all humans on an equal footing and the field of anthropology is practiced throughout the world, anthropologists continue to confront their parochial biases.




Over the next century, as museums with anthropological collections continued to develop as research institutions, many of the anthropologists who worked there turned away from collection-based work. Archaeologists and physical anthropologists continued to use collections for study, but, until a late 20th-century revival of interest in the history of anthropology and museums and in studies of material culture and the anthropology of art, few cultural anthropologists worked actively with collections.

The last quarter of the 20th century witnessed great change in the practice of anthropology in museums. The civil rights and decolonization movements of the 1960s increased awareness of the politics of collecting and representation. Ethical issues that had been ignored in the past began to influence museum practices. By the turn of the 21st century, most anthropologists working in museums had understood the need to incorporate diverse points of view in exhibitions and collections care and to rely on the expertise of people from the cultures represented as well as museum professionals. At the same time, many new museums—such as the U’mista Cultural Centre (1980) in Alert Bay, British Columbia, Canada—were established within the communities that created the objects on display. Anthropologists in museums also were concerned with issues such as the ethics of collecting, access to collections and associated data, and ownership and repatriation.


I just got a whole story for you to get it xD (I made some mistakes i think ;-;)

Hope this helps! ~ Kana ^^


6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What became known as the Mississippi scheme
Sergio039 [100]
It's John Law's attempt to populate the colony of Louisana known as the Mississippi
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • When did activities occur that demonstrate Americans' belief in Manifest Destiny?
    7·2 answers
  • In regard to regulating companies Roosevelt wanted them to serve
    11·2 answers
  • How effective was the league of nations as an international peacekeeping organization?
    14·1 answer
  • Who was Marco polo, and why was he important?
    13·2 answers
  • Imagine a local company sells solar energy equipment. The owners want to start a business in a new state. They know they will be
    13·1 answer
  • n economic system is the method a society uses to __________. A. regulate its money supply B. produce and distribute goods and s
    14·2 answers
  • If you were to group the events from 1789 through 1865 into a single period, which of the following names would best describe it
    9·1 answer
  • What events do you think had the greatest impact on American society during the 1920s? In American politics? In the American eco
    15·1 answer
  • What effect did the columbian exchange have on europe? pick 5 correct answers
    5·2 answers
  • HELP!!!!!<br><br> What were George Washington's contributions during the revolution???
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!