They walked across the Bering Straight, which was a land bridge at the time
<span>The party began as a single-issue party, but has grown to address other issues.
</span>
The Telecommunications Act of 1996 is the first major overhaul of telecommunications law in almost 62 years. This new rule aims to open up all communications businesses to everyone, allowing them to compete in any market against one another.
What was the main result of the Telecommunications Act of 1996?
The measure drastically lowered restrictions on cross-ownership and media concentration. Deregulation reduced competition and made it possible for businesses like AOL/Time Warner and Viacom to acquire several media outlets in local communities.
What did the Telecommunications Act of 1966 do?
The purpose of the law, according to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), was to "let anyone enter any communications business - to let any communications business compete in any market against any other." Deregulation of the convergent broadcasting and telecommunications markets was the main objective of the legislation.
Learn more about Telecommunications Act of 1966: brainly.com/question/3364707
#SPJ4
Answer:
1). Two things to wear - <u>SHIRT, SKIRT</u>
2).Two grains - <u>WHEAT, MAIZE</u>
3).TWO transport - <u>TRAIN, PLANE</u>
Explanation:
As per the given letters, the two clothes' names would be 'shirt' and 'skirt' while the name of two grains that can be formed would be 'wheat' and 'maize' and the transports would be 'train' and 'plane.' <u>The rearrangement of letters is an effective technique that allows the students to make meaningful words, practice them, and remember them effectively</u>. Thus, it promotes the development of vocabulary and grammatical knowledge. It also enhances the logical ability of the students.
Answer:
How is democracy and monarchy alike?
Explanation:
both types of monarch are theoretically invested with certain prerogative powers, which he or she can use if they so wish. Absolute monarchs can use this power without fear of constitutional repercussions, whereas constitutional monarchs cannot
