The correct answer is <span>ultimately led congress to pass a new law giving workers expanded rights to sue in cases where they learn of discriminatory treatment well after it has started
In the supreme court case, it was proven that she didn't have the right to act upon it because the time period for suing had long expired by the time she figured out what was happening. This motivated the congress to pass an act that protected women even after the 180 days period which was originally mentioned in the case.</span>
Yup, that is indeed true. For example, a merit scholarship is given to a student who has shown exceptional academic performance.
<span>I
think this requires my opinion so I would say that I would lean on the process
of controlled isolationism. The analogy behind it would be like this:
I will not bother you so do not bother me, and if you would feel my wrath if
you try and harm me.</span>
Answer:
number five is the first one and number 6 is the second one
