The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Many European nations offer government services that are not offered in the United States. In order to do this, they require their citizens to pay higher taxes. The United States doesn't follow the same system because in Europe the governments invest in offering affordable services to the citizens, trying to consider the necessities of the poor. There are social programs aimed to facilitate health services and other services so much needed for the medium and low class.
In the United States, many services are seen as a business, Private companies offer the services but as a business to make a profit, not thinking about the necessities of less favored or poor. Depending on the political party in power, sometimes there are social programs to help the people, as in the case of the Democratic administration that raises more taxes to fund these programs. On the other hand, when the Republicans run the government, they do not like to raise more taxes to fund social programs. They think that people have to pay for the services they need.
Explanation:
I think the answer is c but i don't know for sure
Answer:
strike
Explanation:
Each frivolous or malicious lawsuit or appeal that an inmate files counts as a strike against the inmate.
Answer: C. increasing global coffee trade
Explanation: the answer is C. increasing global coffee trade, because we need to sell all coffee and in the country is not possible because of the saturated market, and Daniel need make use of the coffee to get earnings,
in the rest of answer you will find that Daniel can not sell the coffee, because off that the rest of answer is wrong.
Now keep in mind that a good mixture of all answer will be a better market for daniel but according to the question he need make use of this excess capacity, and he can do it selling all the coffee and like this not possible in the country we can find it in another country increasing global coffee trade
Answer:
It underlines Ubuntu's compassion and empathy, and our courts should promote that principle through rehabilitation, taking into account the potential for reconciliation between an offender and the community. Still have questions?
