Answer:
Arizona v. Gant
Explanation:
Arizona v. Gant (2009), was a USA Supreme Court choice stating that the 4th Amendment to the USA Constitution requires law implementation officials to exhibit a real and proceeding with danger to their wellbeing presented by an arrestee, or a need to protect proof identified with the wrongdoing of capture from altering by the arrestee, so as to legitimize a warrantless vehicular pursuit episode to capture directed after the vehicle's ongoing tenants have been captured and made sure about.
All of them would be correct
That a government action violates the Establishment Clause of the United States' constitution if it lacks a secular purpose, has its primary effect as promoting or inhibiting religion, or fosters an excessive entanglement of government with religion.
Used to assess whether a law violates the Establishment Clause. The "Establishment Clause" was intended to prevent any governmental endorsement or support of religion.
