This story of Jones and Smith tie back to Nozick's "Experience Machine because they back-up the claim that having enjoyable experiences that are "in contact with reality" is necessary for happiness.
<h3>What does the
experience machine prove?</h3>
According to a preliminary reading of Nozick's argument, it shows that we have good reasons not to link to the Machine. Such defenses could not be accepted by the mental condition known as welfarism. The important query is whether or not it makes moral sense for us to plug in.
We desire both subjective pleasure and some sense of objective worth in our life, as seen by our resistance to plug into the computer. For instance, we'd prefer to actually write a good novel than to merely be content with the notion.
Thus, they back-up the claim that having enjoyable experiences that are "in contact with reality.
For more information about experience machine prove, click here:
brainly.com/question/18859659
#SPJ1