Answer:
Syed fue declarado culpable de matar a Hae Min Lee.
Explicación:
En 1999, Syed fue declarado culpable de matar a Hae Min Lee, su ex novia y compañera de clase, y fue condenado a cadena perpetua durante 30 años. En el momento de su asesinato, tanto Adnan Syed como Hae Min Lee eran estudiantes de último año en Woodlawn High School en Baltimore. Lee desapareció el 13 de enero de 1999 y su cuerpo medio enterrado fue encontrado después de cuatro semanas en un parque de la ciudad cercana. El estrangulamiento manual es la principal causa de su muerte. En febrero de 2000, Syed fue declarado culpable de asesinato y condenado a cadena perpetua de 30 años. Syed nunca ha confesado su crimen y ha mantenido su inocencia. No hay evidencia ante el tribunal por el asesinato de Hae Min Lee. Fue capturado por la confesión del amigo de Syed, Jay Wilds, sobre el secuestro y asesinato de Hae Min Lee. Syed ganó prominencia en 2014 cuando Sarah Koenig lanzó el podcast Serial para reexaminar su caso, pero el juez del tribunal de circuito Martin Welch anuló su condena en 2016.
Answer: Communication skills are key to make a good law enforcement officer regarding problems in difficult situations. It is mainly important because having effective communication skills builds trust, respect, and understanding to the situation, and to the other individual. What makes a good law enforcement officer is one that knows how to communicate in order to achieve and solve problems or concerns using reliable and effective information. Therefore, the officer can operate through the difficult problem no matter the circumstance if using key skills through communication. Without this requirement, an officer would not be able to handle various situations which can lead to a more chaotic, difficult, unnecessary, or even dangerous situation.
Explanation:
The case portrays the need for a review of income and property taxes, highlighting information on which taxes should or should not have their exemption limits extended and how this affects the country's infrastructure.
Accordingly, we can answer the other questions as follows:
- Economic research is against increasing the income tax exemption limit, as this would harm the poorest population.
- The research states that the property tax is important for the growth of the country's infrastructure, in addition to falling on objects that are easy to identify and that belong to the richest population.
<h3>How does the survey present this information?</h3>
The research shows that the income import should matter the exemption in the poorest population and this is a way to promote more taxpayers for this tax. This is because by allowing poor people to be exempt from income tax, the State promotes economic ascension, allowing these people to reach higher economic levels and leave the lower classes, becoming taxpayers.
However, the research is in favor of extending the exemption limits for property tax. This is because these taxes must fall on people who own buildings and residences. These people have a higher economic standard and are easily identified since the properties are immovable assets.
Learn more about income tax:
brainly.com/question/17075354
#SPJ1
Explanation:
The increasing population and urbanization have resulted into changes in the land use pattern. Large scale forests have been destructed to expand land for cultivation.
