Answer:
US Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal’s last-minute push to garner support for Democratic US vice-presidential nominee Kamala Harris by deploying culinary soft power has sparked a social-media storm among Indians.
On the night before the election, Jayapal, the first South Asian-American woman elected to the US House of Representatives, tweeted about making “paneer tikka” in honour of the California senator, saying the latter mentioned on Instagram that her favourite north Indian food was any kind of tikka.
Explanation:
The strengths of dispute resolution strategies are that dispute resolution rarely results in arrests and is less expensive than adjudication, and focuses on resolving miscommunication and misunderstanding issues.
<h3>What is dispute resolution?</h3>
Dispute resolution is a strategy to resolve differences between two or more groups regarding an issue peacefully and through dialogue.
This method is considered the most appropriate for solving problems because it prevents disputes from ending in violent confrontations and one of those involved being injured or killed. On the contrary, this method ensures that all parties involved get their demands or needs.
According to the above, it can be inferred that as a result of dispute resolution costs can be reduced, number of arrests and it is a way to clarify the message that each one wants to express.
Learn more about communication in: brainly.com/question/22558440
#SPJ1
Answer:
GHB Sdn Bhd and Sandhu
The prospect for Sandhu to recover the extra commission negotiated with Ahmad during golf is very remote.
1. It was made under undue influence, when Ahmad could have lacked the capacity to make a binding contract. In addition, at that time, Sandhu disclosed that the land was being sought after by many other parties as a way of piling unnecessary pressure on Ahmad.
2. There was no intention to create a legal relation because the additional commission represents a counter-offer. Since the earlier offer was fully documented, this additional offer should have also followed the same process if the company intended to be legally bound.
3. There is lack of consideration to back this additional contract. In the first place, the main contract with Sandhu was made in view of his negotiation skills. So what is Sandhu expected to offer the company in exchange for the extra commission? Nothing.
Explanation:
GHB cannot be expected to promise 0.5% extra commission on a deal, which was equivalent to RM2 million, when an already executed contract for 3% commission had been reached. One can also claim that Ahmad, who suffered from occasional dementia, could have made the promise without the intention for it to be binding on his company but as a way of encouraging Sandhu to close the deal in favor of GHB. Was the deal closed because of the extra commission? No.
Answer:b is the answer I think.....
