The question is incomplete. This is the complete question:
Which of the following is not a permissible circumstance under which to implement a prior restraint, under Near v. Minnesota?
a. obscene publications.
b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
c. Obstruction of military recruitment.
d. Publication of troop movement in the time of war.
Answer:
The answer is b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
Explanation:
Although it is possible for certain words to cause immense violence when used in publications, under Near v. Minnesota (a United States Supreme Court decision which declared that prior restraints on publication violated the freedom of speech and press) it is still not permissible to implement a prior restraint, even when publications use fighting words that are likely to promote immense violence.
Answer:
floods happen bc of a hurricane when a hurricane is cause by the earth when its shaken
This is a compound sentence.
A compound sentence contains at least two independent clauses. An independent clause is a clause that can exist on its own, unlike dependent clauses. In the sentence above, there are two independent clauses:
1. A<span>n éclair—a long, thin, frosted pastry—is traditionally filled with vanilla cream
2. (But) I</span><span>ts flavor can be enhanced with other fillings, such as chocolate, coffee, strawberry, or pistachio</span>
Answer: Emic perspective
Explanation:
Emic perspective is the approach in which perspective of the subject is considered in any study.It is believed that various realities are recognized and accepted in this perspective.Insider point-of view is included in emic perspective.
According to the question, emic perspective is used for understanding the situation of different cultural background by the parent of the partners that got engaged.Thus,they are recognizing the reality of culture and understanding that it would not creates dispute between them,
D) Politician and Military General
