A. 1%
B.15%
C.5%
These are the correct answers for this question
Option A. If a historian takes a source out of context, she is likely to:
A. misunderstand the intended meaning of historical actions.
<h3>What does it mean to take things out of context?</h3>
This is used to refer to the fact that a person is taking what is being said outside of the meaning that the message is supposed to convey. It has to do with not being able to understand what is said and interpreting it accordingly.
In this situation, when the historian takes things out of their context, then it means that they would not understand the true meaning of the happenings of that period.
Read more on historical events here: brainly.com/question/17040564
#SPJ1
C. his comparison of moral courage to bravery in battle and intelligence
(Not sure, but I hope this helps)
A check is a set of written direction which tells a financial institution or a bank how to use the money for paying someone. That someone is the person who the issuer of check owes the money. The issuer of the check will be the one who is responsible in paying the financial institution or the bank with the amount of money stated on the check. The check also serves as good as cash or it can also be a post cash payment to someone. It can also be served as a collateral to someone's liability.
Answer:
You could rephrase this passage from the U.S. Constitution in these words:
"We, citizens of the United States, take the responsibility to defend our freedom, and guarantee it for the future generations."
The Preamble of the Constitution states that constitutional rights have to be thought of as not only something for the living, but also something to be preserved at any cost for the Americans who have yet to be born.
Explanation:
