Answer:
C) $22,727.
Explanation:
to calculate the 2019 layer, I will first determine the value of the 2019 inventory using LIFO:
(2018 inventory / 2018 price index) + (2019 inventory - 2018 inventory) = ($300,000 / 1.1) + ($350,000 - $300,000) = $272,727 + $50,000 = $322,727
to determine the LIFO layer = adjusted 2019 inventory - 2018 inventory = $322,727 - $300,000 = $22,727
The LIFO layer represents the difference in cost of goods sold from the ending of one year to the next year.
shmrock corporation recorded a right-of-use asset for 187,600 as a result of a finanec lease
<h3>What is
lease?</h3>
A lease is a contract that requires the user to pay the owner for the use of an asset. Property, buildings, and vehicles are examples of leased assets. Leasing is also used for industrial or commercial equipment. A lease agreement is essentially a contract between two parties: the lessor and the lessee.
The primary distinction between a lease and a rent agreement is the length of time they cover. A rental agreement is typically for a short period of time (usually 30 days), whereas a lease contract is for a longer period of time (usually 12 months, though 6 and 18-month contracts are also common).
Finance leasing, operating leasing, and contract hire are the three main types of leasing.
To know more about lease follow the link:
brainly.com/question/24460932
#SPJ4
The theory which could maybe explain this situation is "play hard ,work hard"
Answer:
Neither nominal damages nor punitive damages.
Explanation:
Nominal damage is defined as money from a defendant that is awarded to a plaintiff for a legal wrong. The amount awarded does not meet up to the financial loss incurred.
Punitive damage is the type that is awarded to punish the defendant for an injury or wrong done to a plaintiff. This is also called exemplary damages.
In the given scenario the owner will not be able to recover either punitive or nominal damages from the movers.
This is because movers used a rope and pulley apparatus to lift the anvils on the outside of the building to a second-story window. This was aimed at not harming anyone within the building.
Also when it fell the anvil was not even dented.
So there was no basis for the negligence charge as there was no injury inflicted.