Answer:
b. increasing the aggregate demand
Explanation:
The correct answer to the question is b. increasing the aggregate demand. The Increase in aggregate demand will not have effects on the inflation it will remain constant. Higher productivity growth will be set of by increasing the aggregate demand of the country. Increasing aggregate demand positively impacts large number of individuals in a country.
Answer:
Option (a) is correct.
Explanation:
Here, shoes are normal goods as there is a positive relationship between the income level of the consumer and the quantity demanded for shoes. It can be seen that as the income of the consumer increases from $19,000 to $21,000 then as a result the quantity of pairs of shoes demanded increases from 9 to 11 pairs. Normal goods are generally have positive income elasticity of demand.
Therefore, the shoes are normal goods in this case.
Answer and Explanation:
1. Interest Revenue $23,000
Sales Revenue $510,000
To Income Summary $533000
(Being closing of revenues accounts are closed)
2. Income Summary $453,000
To Sales returns $20,000
To Sales Discounts $7,000
To Cost Of goods sold $310,000
To Freight out $2,000
To Advertise Exp $15,000
To Interest Exp $19,000
To Salaries & Wages $55,000
To Utility $18,000
To Depreciation $7,000
(Being closing of expenses accounts are closed)
3. Income Summary $80,000
To Retained Earning $80,000
(Being profit is recorded)
4. Retained Earning $30,000
To Dividends $30,000
(Being closing of dividend is recorded)
Answer: Deductible
Explanation:
Deductible is a specified amount of money an insured individual must pay before an insurance company will pay a claim.
It should be noted that in insurance policy, deductible simply refers to the amount that is paid by the insured before the expenses incurred by the person will be paid by the insurance company.
For example, is there is a $3000 deductible for a particular plan. One has to pay the $3000 first before before the insurance company settles other things.
Answer:
He could afford to spend $133,411 for the device now.
Explanation:
The maximum the surgeon could afford for the device is equal to the sum of present value of the lawsuit costs that he can avoid in year 2 and year 5 which is:
+ Year 2: 600,000 * %out-of-pocket cost for the law suit = 600,000 * 10% = $60,000;
+ Year 5: 1,350,000 * %out-of-pocket cost for the law suit = 1,350,000 * 10% = $135,000.
=> The amount he can afford for the device = 60,000 / 1.1^2 + 135,000 / 1.1^5 = $133,411.
So, the answer is $133,411.