Answer:
Option (B) is correct.
Explanation:
The utility maximization point for a consumer is as follows:
It is given that,
price of Pepsi(x) = $1 per can
price of a hamburger(y) = $2
Marginal utility from Pepsi = 4
Marginal utility from hamburgers = 6
Hence,
4 > 3
Therefore, it can be seen that the consumer's utility is not maximized at this point.
Law of diminishing marginal utility states that as the consumer consumes more and more quantity of goods then as a result the utility obtained from the consumption goes on diminishing.
So, there is a need to increase the quantity of Pepsi consumed and reducing the quantity of hamburgers consumed.
Answer:
ROI 87.5%
Explanation:
Return on Investment = return /investment
Total return
50,000 perating income + 20,000 residual income = 70,000 income
The asset could been adquire on lease or through liabilities, this is not investment. The investmetn made is the one done by the shareholders.
Stock Holders equity = investment = 80,000
The shareholders invest this amount to generate
70,000 dollars of return
ROI 70,000/80,000 = 87.5%
Answer:
The existing state of American economy must be declared earlier respondent the interrogation.
The U.S. financial position is vigorous in 2017.The value rate is in its perfect vary i.e., 2.4 (2-3%).Joblessness is at its ordinary proportion and there isn't an excessive amount of rise or decrease. Conversely, the value is predicted to descent to a pair of 2.1% in 2018 and 2.0 in 2019. Drop in value would cause decrease in GDP and growth in state.
To avoid this drop I will be able to inscribe to manager of Federal Reserve Bank to cut back the rate (expansionary financial policy).Federal reserve will try this by shopping for bonds. Once Federal Reserve purchases bonds the money offer increases and rate decreases. As rate decreases mixture demand and financial gain increases. With escalation in financial gain and mixture demand the value wouldn't decrease in 2018 and 2019.
I would not recommend an expansionary economic policy as a result of it increases the rate yet and thus results in situation out.
Answer: A: $0.None of the members recognize gain because their debt relief was not in excess of their bases in their LLC interest prior to any debt relief.
B: $55,000
C: $285,000
D: $625,000 Albee, LLC takes a $135,000 carryover basis in the assets Kevan contributes and a $490,000 basis in the total cash the other two members contributed.
Explanation: check attached file
<span>to obtain a product from another country </span>
