1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Black_prince [1.1K]
1 year ago
7

Compare and contrast the views of the religious modernists and fundamentalists. How did Darwinism and the Scopes trial symbolize

the conflict between the two?
History
1 answer:
Zina [86]1 year ago
7 0

The religious modernists were a group of theologians and clergy who embraced modernity and aimed to reconcile science and religion. They believed that God was still active in the world and that religious truth could be discovered through reason and science. The fundamentalists, on the other hand, were a group of conservative Christians who reacted against modernity. They believed that the Bible was the literal word of God and that science was incompatible with Christianity.

The Scopes trial was a symbol of the conflict between the two groups. The trial was held to determine whether a high school teacher, John Scopes, had violated a Tennessee law by teaching evolution. The modernists supported Scopes, while the fundamentalists opposed him. The trial was a victory for the fundamentalists, but it ultimately helped to publicize the modernists' views and to promote religious tolerance.

You might be interested in
Developments in which of these industries made important contributions to improvements in the transportation system in the Unite
Pachacha [2.7K]
It was mainly developments in the "steel" industry that made important contributions to improvements in the transportation system in the United States during this time, since the major advancement in transportation was in the railroads, which were made from steel. 
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did economic sanctions affect apartheid in Africa?
Delvig [45]
<span>When the Afrikaner-backed National Party Came to power in South Africa in 1948, it implemented its campaign promises in the form of high apartheid. This contrasted with the segregationist policies of the pre-war government. While much of that legislation was designed to restructure the organization of economic opportunity in South Africa, apartheid legislation lacked the trademark of systematic exploitation of native Africans (Butler 19). The English speaking whites who had held power before the war were sidelined as the white constituency was consolidated under the National Party, a Afrikaner dominated political group. This allowed the National Party to enact such legislation as the Population Registration Act, which enforced classification into four racial categories: white, Co loured, Asiatic, or native. The next high apartheid landmark was the Group Areas Act of 1950. This act enforced the separate areas of residence by race across the country. It would be this act that eventually led to Promotion of Bantu Self-Government Act of 1959 that transferred Africans’ political rights to these quasi-states, which allowed the South African government to treat natives as foreigners and allow them no political representation in the South African government.</span><span />
5 0
3 years ago
Where is old york and where can i find it?
solmaris [256]

York, Upper Canada, the name of Old Toronto in Canada between 1793 and 1834. Old York Cellars, a winery in New Jersey. Old York Road, built in the 18th century to connect Philadelphia, Pennsylvania with New York City. Old York, or furthermore known as York, is a town located in the north of England.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Helppppppppppp I will mark brainliest solve the history problem
Liula [17]

Answer:

8h8z2h92bziwz kw ziz 3ux eixbeiz eix ei

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the name generally given to a judicial decision that is made to advance the interests of one of the political parties?
Marrrta [24]

Answer: Partisanship

Explanation:

Partisanship refers to political decisions made to favor the policy maker´s party-preferred ideological orientation. When it comes to judicial decisions, a judge becomes a partisan when his rulings are meant to promote the interests of the political party he favors.

Despite the legal model holding to the idea that judicial impartiality forbids any partisan loyalties, partisanship still exists.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What act is this that put it on all public documents
    9·1 answer
  • Which part of the Declaration of Independence acts as an implied plan of action, in that it lists laws and practices to be chang
    9·2 answers
  • What causes air masses to move?
    9·1 answer
  • Explain the republican model of the family what were family members roles
    10·1 answer
  • What is the act of identifying relationships between two or more events in history known as ?
    8·2 answers
  • Pope Leo 111 crowned Charlemagne as holy emperor. What did this indicate about the Catholic Church?
    14·2 answers
  • Who are the part of UN peace keeping force?​
    8·2 answers
  • Who formed an oligarchy?
    6·1 answer
  • Which Southeast Asian country’s largest ethnic group is the Tagalog?
    11·2 answers
  • Fulton County was the first county in Georgia to create a juvenile court in 1911. Today, every county in Georgia has a juvenile
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!