The answer for this one is Simple Subject.
Read the excerpts from Dr. King's "Letter from Birmingham Jail" and answer the question.
[4] I was arrested Friday on a charge of parading without a permit. Now there is nothing wrong with an ordinance which requires a permit for a parade, but when the ordinance is used to preserve segregation and to deny citizens the First Amendment privilege of peaceful assembly and peaceful protest, then it becomes unjust.
[5] I submit that an individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and willingly accepts the penalty by staying in jail to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the very highest respect for law.
[6] We can never forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was "legal" and everything the Hungarian freedom fighters did in Hungary was "illegal." It was "illegal" to aid and comfort a Jew in Hitler's Germany. But I am sure that, if I had lived in Germany during that time, I would have aided and comforted my Jewish brothers even though it was illegal. If I lived in a communist country today where certain principles dear to the Christian faith are suppressed, I believe I would openly advocate disobeying these anti-religious laws. In 3–5 complete sentences, thoroughly explain Dr. King's main idea in this section and what specific details develop it. Provide at least two specific examples from the text to support your analysis of the main idea and how it's developed.
FAST I WILL GIVE BRAINLIST TO THE CORRECT ANSWER!!! I’m not going if you need to get it back before me lol I’m just not going back in
Answer:
1. If Flona wasn't careless, he wouldn't be in trouble
2. Had Jessica not attended the meeting because she was ill?
3. Had Rita didn't listen carefully to Mr. Sau's instructions because she did her homeowork badly.
4. Passing an examination doesn't guarantee a pupil's job.
5. In spite of Saus warning's, Slone went to dance
He is basically saying to get the real story before you turn them into a lie. Basically stating that you need to know the entire story before you make it into some fairytail of lies. When someone has the facts with concrete evidence you cannot twist it into a lie, thus it is stubborn; But statistics are easily twisted because they do not have the evidence to back them up, because they are simply statistics, not facts. Idk if this works but hope it helps!
