1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dezoksy [38]
1 year ago
12

Even if a declarant gives a statement to police concerning an alleged crime, that statement could still qualify as non-testimoni

al if police question the declarant while responding to an _________ ____________ (two words). The Supreme Court demarcated this boundary for testimonial hearsay in Davis v. Washington, 126 S. Ct. 2266 (2006), where the primary purpose of the questioning was not to collect evidence of a past crime, but to secure the scene and protect the declarant.
Courts applying the Davis exception most often summarize it with phrases such as "ongoing emergency" or "emergency situation." When police are responding to an ongoing emergency, their motive is to ensure the safety of all concerned, not to collect evidence. The Supreme Court ruled in Davis that statements elicited by police while responding to an ongoing emergency are not testimonial for purposes of the Confronta
Law
1 answer:
alisha [4.7K]1 year ago
4 0

Courts applying the Davis exception most often summarize it with phrases such as "ongoing emergency" or "emergency situation." When police are responding to an ongoing emergency, their motive is to ensure the safety of all concerned, not to collect evidence. The Supreme Court ruled in Davis that statements elicited by police while responding to an ongoing emergency are not testimonial for purposes of the Confrontation Clause.

Testimonial” hearsay is a statement that:

-ITlooks like the kind of testimony that would be offered at trial in aid of prosecution;

-It is made when the circumstances objectively indicate that there is no ongoing emergency; and

-The primary purpose of the interrogation is to establish or prove past events potentially relevant to a later criminal prosecution.

The Confrontation Clause of the United States Constitution protects the right of a criminal defendant to be confronted by his or her accusers in Court and to cross-examine any testimony that they may offer. The admission of hearsay (an out-of-court statement) – even if admissible under an exception to the rule against hearsay – can be in direct conflict with the right of Confrontation.

On the other hand, “non-testimonial” hearsay is a statement that:

-It is made primarily for the purpose of assisting police to meet an ongoing emergency; or

-It was made primarily for a purpose other than discovering, establishing or proving past events potentially relevant to later criminal prosecution.

To learn more about Testimony visit here ; brainly.com/question/29244222?referrer=searchResultssearchResults

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
6. Fines and penalties are higher for a driver convicted of DUI with a BAC level of .15 or higher or if there
a_sh-v [17]
Trueeeeeee hope that helps
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Kira forges Lew’s name as the drawer of a stolen check, drawn on Metro Bank, and makes the item payable to Kira. Lew is liable t
Harrizon [31]
D. Hope this helps!! :)
5 0
2 years ago
I have a huge question, and I'm in need of an answer fast. If you know someone who is about to be a runaway because they're bein
const2013 [10]

Answer:no

Explanation:because why would the police send the child back to their abusive parents? And the parents need to go to jail too

4 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
DON'T ANSWER THIS! I JSUT WANT TO GET RID OF MY POINTS!
stepladder [879]

Answer:

oh, ok

Explanation:

well, I'll gladly take the points! ;)

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain the difference between Personal Injury Protection and Property Damage Liability insurance.
Temka [501]
Property damage liability insurance helps pay for damage to someone else’s car PIP (personal injury protection) covers medical expenses regardless of who’s at fault.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • ماهوة تعريف الرشوة ؟​
    11·2 answers
  • The largest and most prominent collection of law enforcement agencies, including the United States Marshals Service; the Federal
    12·1 answer
  • Driving alone is a solo activity.<br> A. True<br> B. False
    6·2 answers
  • Why should drivers who text and drive should be punished the same as those who drink and drive.
    15·1 answer
  • 69696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696969696696969696969696
    5·2 answers
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLIST
    8·2 answers
  • On June 1, XYZ Corp. executed a promissory note in the amount of $1 million payable to Jones Corp. for the sale of widgets that
    5·1 answer
  • Test question test question
    13·1 answer
  • Are two cases every really identical? Let's take a look at the cases below.
    8·1 answer
  • 15 A search warrant can force someone to have surgery to retrieve a bullet as long as probable cause exists. QA True B. False Re
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!