1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dezoksy [38]
1 year ago
12

Even if a declarant gives a statement to police concerning an alleged crime, that statement could still qualify as non-testimoni

al if police question the declarant while responding to an _________ ____________ (two words). The Supreme Court demarcated this boundary for testimonial hearsay in Davis v. Washington, 126 S. Ct. 2266 (2006), where the primary purpose of the questioning was not to collect evidence of a past crime, but to secure the scene and protect the declarant.
Courts applying the Davis exception most often summarize it with phrases such as "ongoing emergency" or "emergency situation." When police are responding to an ongoing emergency, their motive is to ensure the safety of all concerned, not to collect evidence. The Supreme Court ruled in Davis that statements elicited by police while responding to an ongoing emergency are not testimonial for purposes of the Confronta
Law
1 answer:
alisha [4.7K]1 year ago
4 0

Courts applying the Davis exception most often summarize it with phrases such as "ongoing emergency" or "emergency situation." When police are responding to an ongoing emergency, their motive is to ensure the safety of all concerned, not to collect evidence. The Supreme Court ruled in Davis that statements elicited by police while responding to an ongoing emergency are not testimonial for purposes of the Confrontation Clause.

Testimonial” hearsay is a statement that:

-ITlooks like the kind of testimony that would be offered at trial in aid of prosecution;

-It is made when the circumstances objectively indicate that there is no ongoing emergency; and

-The primary purpose of the interrogation is to establish or prove past events potentially relevant to a later criminal prosecution.

The Confrontation Clause of the United States Constitution protects the right of a criminal defendant to be confronted by his or her accusers in Court and to cross-examine any testimony that they may offer. The admission of hearsay (an out-of-court statement) – even if admissible under an exception to the rule against hearsay – can be in direct conflict with the right of Confrontation.

On the other hand, “non-testimonial” hearsay is a statement that:

-It is made primarily for the purpose of assisting police to meet an ongoing emergency; or

-It was made primarily for a purpose other than discovering, establishing or proving past events potentially relevant to later criminal prosecution.

To learn more about Testimony visit here ; brainly.com/question/29244222?referrer=searchResultssearchResults

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
Alcohol and other sedative drugs _____ motor
Westkost [7]
B. Because I did the quiz/test depends where you find the answer
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Another name for prison or jail terms is which of the following?
Ronch [10]
Misdemanors ( less serious then a felony)
6 0
2 years ago
Discuss the pros and cons of raising children in correctional institutions. How you expand or limit such programs?
Sveta_85 [38]

Answer:

Explanation:

While systemic reforms ultimately rely on government policies and action, individuals can play a role as well. Initiatives such as the Harvard Organization for Prison Education and Reform and the Petey Greene Program, for example, send trained volunteers to tutor incarcerated individuals with the dual goal of advocating for structural reforms to prison education. Volunteering to tutor students in prison who are working toward their GEDs will reap rewards for students, tutors, and society.

4 0
2 years ago
How high does the number have to be for a state to vote
Alex Ar [27]

Answer:

is there a answer choice

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Looking at the misty rain and fog (pictured above), explain at least two defensive driving techniques you would utilize to adjus
Gennadij [26K]
Driving slowly to minimize risk of an accident and turning in your hazard lights to let people driving past that you are going to drive slow and be very cautious.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • This is the minimum age required by the Constitution for a person to be President.
    7·2 answers
  • Forensic Pathology
    11·1 answer
  • True or False: Lobbyists gain access to government officials by donating to campaigns.
    10·2 answers
  • Hello Brainly Friends! I don't have a question but, I wanted to tell you that... I want you to subscribe to 3 channels. The name
    10·1 answer
  • You guys can have these points​
    9·1 answer
  • Every _____ minutes, somebody dies on the road in the US.
    12·2 answers
  • Ideas, beliefs, or attitudes about what is important are _________.
    5·1 answer
  • Insurance is the transfer of what
    8·1 answer
  • I was confused which one correct
    12·1 answer
  • In the United States, a winning defendant may recover legal fees from the losing party if they prove ____________.
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!