1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dezoksy [38]
1 year ago
12

Even if a declarant gives a statement to police concerning an alleged crime, that statement could still qualify as non-testimoni

al if police question the declarant while responding to an _________ ____________ (two words). The Supreme Court demarcated this boundary for testimonial hearsay in Davis v. Washington, 126 S. Ct. 2266 (2006), where the primary purpose of the questioning was not to collect evidence of a past crime, but to secure the scene and protect the declarant.
Courts applying the Davis exception most often summarize it with phrases such as "ongoing emergency" or "emergency situation." When police are responding to an ongoing emergency, their motive is to ensure the safety of all concerned, not to collect evidence. The Supreme Court ruled in Davis that statements elicited by police while responding to an ongoing emergency are not testimonial for purposes of the Confronta
Law
1 answer:
alisha [4.7K]1 year ago
4 0

Courts applying the Davis exception most often summarize it with phrases such as "ongoing emergency" or "emergency situation." When police are responding to an ongoing emergency, their motive is to ensure the safety of all concerned, not to collect evidence. The Supreme Court ruled in Davis that statements elicited by police while responding to an ongoing emergency are not testimonial for purposes of the Confrontation Clause.

Testimonial” hearsay is a statement that:

-ITlooks like the kind of testimony that would be offered at trial in aid of prosecution;

-It is made when the circumstances objectively indicate that there is no ongoing emergency; and

-The primary purpose of the interrogation is to establish or prove past events potentially relevant to a later criminal prosecution.

The Confrontation Clause of the United States Constitution protects the right of a criminal defendant to be confronted by his or her accusers in Court and to cross-examine any testimony that they may offer. The admission of hearsay (an out-of-court statement) – even if admissible under an exception to the rule against hearsay – can be in direct conflict with the right of Confrontation.

On the other hand, “non-testimonial” hearsay is a statement that:

-It is made primarily for the purpose of assisting police to meet an ongoing emergency; or

-It was made primarily for a purpose other than discovering, establishing or proving past events potentially relevant to later criminal prosecution.

To learn more about Testimony visit here ; brainly.com/question/29244222?referrer=searchResultssearchResults

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
Alice and Bertie are the beneficiaries of a trust established for them by their father, Chester.
-Dominant- [34]
I think it’s a carrot
5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following was the first instance or classifying cases as criminal or civil
VARVARA [1.3K]

Answer:

I believe that it was either code of hammurabi or roman law.

5 0
3 years ago
What is your opinion or belief as to the Electoral College vote process for the Presidential Elections?
stiks02 [169]
I personally disagree with the Electoral College. It was a system that worked 200 years ago. The system now just doesn’t work because we have all these things like mail in voting, claimed election fraud, etc. Not only that but the electoral college could have a bias against a candidate. If you look at Hilary Clinton for example. She ran for President in 2016 but ended up losing the Electoral College vote but won the popular vote. Now she is an electoral college member which obviously, she wouldn’t vote for trump. The only reason the Electoral College is because the original framers said that the president and Vice President should be decided by a set group of people. Which today, is the Electoral College. Hope this helps!
3 0
3 years ago
Relacion folklore y nacionalismo
Maslowich

Answer

thanks for the points

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
You are planning a hunt that will involve
insens350 [35]

Answer:

shouldnt it be all of the above lol

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are the different terms for the judges in each system?
    5·1 answer
  • Sonoma County passed a law making it legal to drive 65 mph on freeways inside the county, A state law limited all vehicles anywh
    6·1 answer
  • Summarize the elements that have been proven:<br> 1.<br> 2<br> 3<br> I
    12·1 answer
  • ___ Is a state of drunkenness or similar condition created by the use of drugs and alcohol
    14·1 answer
  • Why did the Kent mayor declare a civil emergency and call in the Ohio National
    10·2 answers
  • Why does my girl not text me back whenever she is at my bestfriends house?
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following is known as the "supreme law of the land?"A.The Executive BranchB.The federal governmentC.The U.S. Con
    10·1 answer
  • How is harvey birdman, attorney at law different from other legal shows?.
    14·1 answer
  • 2. Which leadership position in Congress has the most power?
    7·2 answers
  • Name 3 ways that people are ushered into a permanent 2nd-class status via the criminal justice system.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!