Answer:
Option A (Prepare taxes for compensation) is the correct choice.
Explanation:
In the above question, options are not given. Please find the attachment of the full question.
- A PTIN (preparer tax identification number) would be an inland revenue department Service identifier that was introduced in 1999 requiring all compensated federal income tax returns appraisers to registered with either the legislative branch as well as to receive a special code from 2010.
- Here because the tax identifying number or code of George's Preparer has indeed been withdrawn and so he can't take responsibility for taxation for reimbursement.
The remaining three options do not apply to a particular instance. So option A seems to be the right one.
Answer: Yes
Explanation:
Because with the crime it can give us a statics and that will how us how society is. But only using statics.
Answer: Judicial Waiver
Explanation:
A judicial waiver occurs when a juvenile court judge transfers a case from juvenile to adult court in order to deny the juvenile the protections that juvenile jurisdictions provide.
Answer:
Exclusionary Rule.
Explanation:
The exclusionary rule is a legal rule of the constitution that prevents any illegal search and seizure of 'evidence' that is collected in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the U. S. Constitution. It also prevents the presentation of such 'evidence' in a court of law.
This rule also states that any evidence collected in violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) may not be admissible in a court of law as legal evidence as it is 'seized' in violation of the person's constitutional rights. The Fourth Amendment of the U. S. Constitution prevents the government from doing any search or seizure of 'evidence' of a person's home without due reasonable reason. Thus, it prevents a person's from being forcefully searched. So, when such searches are done and evidence produced before the court, they are not admissible under the exclusionary rule.
Answer:
It is meant to overhaul Canada's Indigenous child welfare system, which critics have for years described as inadequate and discriminatory
Explanation:
